avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Published on 24 March

Poland , no. 23692/09, 3 March 2015; Premininy v. Russia , no.   44973/04, 10 February 2011; Rodić and Others v. Bosnia and   Herzegovina , no. 22893/05, 27 May 2008)?   3.

    On 22 March 2021 the Sofia Military Court decided to place the applicant in pre-trial detention. She appealed, but on 26 March 2021 the Military Court of Appeal upheld that decision. 3.

  10597/13, §§ 27 and 35, 26 March 2019). OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATION UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 11.     The applicant in application no.

The applicant placed too much weight on the finding of the Court of Appeal that, on a balance of probabilities, he would have been released had the review taken place in March 2008.

In its reasoning the District Court referred to the findings of the judgment of 1 June 2004 on account of Mr P.’s criminal negligence.

An accountant report was also submitted to the file, finding no evidence of any wrongdoing by the applicant. The courts did not comment on that report.

The first applicant opposed the findings and the Tax Authority’s decision but, on 21 December 1995, the Tax Authority decided not to change its original decision.

On an unspecified date the applicant community lodged a claim against the Committee with the Baku Administrative-Economic Court No. 2, asking the court to nullify an order of the Committee dated 18 March

This finding was in accordance with the R v.

   The case was referred to the Court on 14 March 1985 by the European Commission of Human Rights ("the Commission").

  The hearing before the Court of Cassation took         place on 9 March 1989.

A new appeal hearing was fixed for 21 March 2002. 17.     On 21 March 2002 the St.

The event was scheduled to take place from 4 to 8 p. m. on 5 March 2014. The Mayor gave his official approval for holding the event.

MARXER                  B.

   The present case was referred to the Court on 12 March 1982 by the European Commission of Human Rights ("the Commission").

    By a judgment of 7 March 2002 the court allowed the plaintiffs' claim in part.

as of 10 March 2023.

A new appeal hearing was fixed for 21 March 2002. 22.     On 21 March 2002 the St.