CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

285 résultats pour « Lisa DEGARDIN »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0728JUD007430701

Admin. suprême

28 juillet 2009

28 juillet 2009

been subjected to ill ‑ treatment while being held in police custody, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading

Page 14 sur 15

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0612JUD003596897

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2003

12 juin 2003

Furthermore, applying to join the armed forces did not indicate female feelings, and she had left the armed forces not because of the feeling that she was a “woman” but because she had experienced degrading

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0402JUD004875119

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2026

2 avril 2026

UKRAINE (Applications nos. 48751/19 and 41 others – see appended list)     JUDGMENT Art 34 • Undue interference with the exercise of the right of individual application of forty of the applicants

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0130JUD000967115

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2020

30 janvier 2020

Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0708DEC002164993

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 1993

8 juillet 1993

        In 1986 [his] father died in what the press called a       "massacre" in a prison in Lima.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0409JUD002630795

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2002

9 avril 2002

    Accordingly, the application should be struck out of the list. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT 1 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0827JUD001738920

Admin. suprême

27 août 2024

27 août 2024

of the offence • Foreseeable and not expansive interpretation and application of the criminal-law statute in question Art 3 (substantive) • Applicant’s conditions of detention were not inhuman or degrading

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0708JUD006099900

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2008

8 juillet 2008

had been subjected to ill-treatment during his detention in police custody in violation of Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0603DEC004113898

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2003

3 juin 2003

In a letter dated 8 November 1995, Liga Pro Europa , a human rights association based in Târgu-Mureş, informed the Prefect that six houses had still not been rebuilt, which meant that six families had

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0920JUD004626299

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2005

20 septembre 2005

Article 3 of the Convention reads as follows: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” A.     Arguments before the Court 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0130JUD002306512

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2018

30 janvier 2018

He claimed 25,000   Turkish liras (TRY) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and TRY 30,000 in respect of pecuniary damage. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD005012407

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2017

12 décembre 2017

However, unlike the position with respect to Articles 8 to 11 of the Convention, it is not bound by an exhaustive list of “legitimate aims” under Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 ( ibid ., § 154). 50.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0713JUD000690908

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2010

13 juillet 2010

  28960/08 in respect of Mrs   Raha Hosseinzadgan out of its list of cases. II.     AS REGARDS THE APPLICANT MOHAMMAD JABER ALIPOUR A.     Joinder 48.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0827JUD003288719

Admin. suprême

27 août 2024

27 août 2024

With that finding, it awarded the applicant 25,000 Turkish liras (TRY) – approximately 4,145   euros   (EUR) on the date of the decision – and the reimbursement of his legal costs, while rejecting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506JUD002630795

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2003

6 mai 2003

    Accordingly, the application should be struck out of the list.” II.     PRELIMINARY ISSUE: THE SCOPE OF THE CASE 62.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD005963513

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2017

17 janvier 2017

Antoni, the president of the Romanian non-governmental organisation The Justice League Against Abuses and Corruption in Romania ( Liga dreptății ȋmpotriva abuzurilor şi corupției din România – hereafter

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-158074

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2015

21 septembre 2015

} .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   Communicated on 21 September 2015   FIRST SECTION Application no. 35816/10 Timur TANGIYEV against Russia and 10 other applications (see list

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2130

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2008

29 mai 2008

Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Remainder inadmissible;Struck out of the list (Article 37-1 - Striking out applications);Violation

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0529JUD000183904

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2008

29 mai 2008

Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Remainder inadmissible;Struck out of the list (Article 37-1 - Striking out applications);Violation

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12176

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2018

6 novembre 2018

Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(

Résumé IA — à vérifier