At the close of the hearing the City Court read out the operative part of its judgment. 10.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

    At the hearing of 26 March 2003 the first-instance court ordered the re-summoning of the witnesses who had not attended the previous hearings, although the applicants had expressly stated

    The first applicant company claimed that the lack of an oral hearing despite its explicit request thereof had violated its right to a fair hearing. 24.

of the events described in the previous Article arises in respect of a party who has joined the proceedings while represented by his lawyer, the latter declares the occurrence of that event at the hearing

    However, according to the transcript of the hearing, the judge adjourned the hearing until the arrival of the State-funded lawyer at 5.30   p.m. and the applicant expressed his wish

Article   6 § 1, in so far as relevant, reads as follows: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal ...”

    The Government submitted that M.I. and A.V. had testified during the court hearing held on 1   March 2005, and that the District Court in its judgment of 3   April 2008 referred

    The Court notes that the applicants, detainees at the time of the events, were not afforded an opportunity to attend hearings in civil proceedings to which they were parties.

He relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the relevant part of which reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ...

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

    The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the court hearings were held in camera without any reason.

decision in the event of a judge deciding to close a hearing to the public.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Public hearing)

    The applicant alleged under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that he had not been afforded a fair hearing. 4.

  22840/07, §§ 14-15, 3 June 2014), which provides, in so far as relevant: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal