in examining requests for release/objection Delay in examination by the Constitutional Court   25979/22 Kandemir v.

Despite the above delays imputable to the District Court, the overall length of the proceedings was principally due to the complexity of the case. B.

DELPHE S. C. I.

The applicant had provided no explanation for the delay between the summons and his statement of claim and no valid excuse had been provided for the later delay.

HOSPITALISATION COMPLÈTE - DÉLAI DE 12 JOURS ADMISSION A LA DEMANDE DU REPRÉSENTANT DE L’ETAT Article L. 3211-12-1 du code de la santé publique ORDONNANCE DE MAINLEVÉE Rendue le 07/10/2025 Morgane LE DELEY

In his view there was an unjustified delay of four years. 13.

Bulgaria - 36843/97 Judgment 4.12.2003 [Section I] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Reasonable time Significant periods of delay despite reasonableness of overall length – relevance of matter at

As regards the unreasonable delay, the Government refers the Court to changes that have been made, since the delay arose in this case, to the way in which the Mercantile Court in Manchester (which also

The problem that arose was the authorities’ delay in substituting a less stringent preventive measure, namely house arrest, for detention in prison.

interim resolution adopted at its 1396 th meeting (March 2020) (DH), urging the authorities to ensure that all the necessary individual measures are taken in respect of each applicant without any further delay

Although the Court recognises that this delay was entirely attributable to the delay in the related cases of R v. Knights and R v.

  1: The delay in question amounted to an interference, which the Government had failed to justify, with the applicants’ right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions.

in consultation by a specialist, lack of/delay in medical examination, lack of/delay in medical testing, lacking/delayed diet, lacking/delayed drug therapy   from 07/01/2016 and possibly ongoing

At a preliminary hearing on 23 October 2012 the applicant company complained of delays in the processing of the case.

In his view, the State cannot invoke the difficulties in the constitution of courts with jurors to justify the delay in the proceedings.

there was no unreasonable delay in this respect. 55.

T R I B U N A L JUDICIAIRE D’[Localité 1] --- Cabinet du magistrat du siège du tribunal judiciaire Morgane LE DELEY, Vice Présidente N° dossier: N° RG 25/02772 - N° Portalis DB3Q-W-B7J-RIX6 MINUTE

T R I B U N A L JUDICIAIRE D’[Localité 2] --- Cabinet du magistrat du siège du tribunal judiciaire Morgane LE DELEY, Vice Présidente N° dossier: N° RG 25/02773 - N° Portalis DB3Q-W-B7J-RIYU MINUTE

siège social est [Adresse 4] et encore [Adresse 5] [Localité 2] [Adresse 6] - RCS B 440048882 Partie défenderesse : assistée de la SELARL ARMA - Me Arnaud PERICARD Avocat et comparant par Me Nicole DELAY-PEUCH

accounted for six months' delay between January and July 1999.