By a judgment of 9 May 2003 the Constanța District Court acquitted the applicant and his co-defendant of all charges.

He had thus not proved that he was the victim’s heir and lacked standing to bring proceedings for damages. 6.

The applicants would be inconvenienced by noise pollution and constant vibrations as a result of the construction work.

X..., la cour d'appel a violé l'article 1147 ancien du code civil ; Mais attendu qu'après avoir constaté que la piste sur laquelle a eu lieu l'accident dépend du domaine skiable accessible par gravité

The applicant brought a claim for damages against the State.

Hanu, a lawyer practising in Constanţa.

The right to compensation A public corporation is vicariously liable in damages for injury or damage caused through error or negligence in the exercise of public authority.

to      damages, as distinct from an account of profits."

  Payment of just satisfaction and individual measures   a) Details of just satisfaction   Pecuniary damage Non-pecuniary damage Costs and expenses Total   12   000 EUR  

According to section 1, an employer is vicariously liable in damages for injury or damage caused by an employee through an error or negligence at work.

The sum of EUR 7,500 in damages was awarded to each of the judges, to be paid by the applicant jointly with the two other defendants.

On 28/06/2022 the applicant lodged an online application about damage of property via the DIIA website.

Le fils de la requérante a été scolarisé en classe de CP à Dammarie-les-Lys au titre de l'année scolaire 2021-2022.

Accordingly, Lithuania and Romania, on account of their “acquiescence and connivance” in the HVD Programme had to be regarded as responsible for the violation of the applicants’ rights under Article &#

Accordingly, Lithuania and Romania, on account of their “acquiescence and connivance” in the HVD Programme had to be regarded as responsible for the violation of the applicants’ rights under Article 3

There are grounds for asserting that since the State has initiated activity on the shelf that entails a constant risk of damage and injury, it is reasonable to expect the State to contribute to bearing

Municipal Criminal Court the second applicant set out her civil claim for damages against M.P. 126.

have rendered the infliction of damage absolutely necessary, a question of compensation for that damage should be resolved by a civil procedure. 3.

It therefore considered that the indemnity was not due if the building did not damage the landscape.