On the fourth day of trial, while K was being cross-examined, an adjournment was granted because K claimed to feel unwell.

Deferral of payment of the judgment debt Because of the research centre’s financial hardship, in April 2012 the court allowed it to pay the judgment debt by instalments by November 2013.

parties to the present civil case had been given access to that material; because the experts had not explained how they had analysed M.’s DNA profile; and because there was no evidence that the experts

On 3   December 2008 a court replaced the suspended sentence with the custodial one because Mr Kholodkov had persistently failed to report to the probation authorities.

Of the fifteen hearings listed between 21 August 1998 and 13 July 2001, two hearings were adjourned because the applicant did not attend, three hearings were postponed because both parties defaulted, and

It wished to obtain a licence for digital broadcasting because it assumed that after 2015 it would no longer be able to operate using its licence for analogue broadcasting (see paragraph 3 above). 6.

The applicants complain under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention that the criminal proceedings against them were not fair because the Court of Appeal convicted them without conducting a proper hearing

One night in December 1997, whilst the youth in question and three of his friends were driving along the motorway, the police ordered them to stop because the speed at which they were driving appeared

  Damage Non-pecuniary damage because applicant had not had a fair hearing: compensation awarded.

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête enregistrée le 19 juin 2023, Mme D B veuve E, représentée par Me Bechaux demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler les décisions du 16 mars 2023 par lesquelles

His credibility was also doubtful because of the details he had known about the relationship between two of the victims of the incident and the defendant, and because of the fact that he was familiar with

been born in Croatia but had before their retention had habitual residence in Germany, (b) the applicant and the children’s mother had never married and, (c) under German law, which was applicable because

The applicant complains under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention that the criminal proceedings against him were unfair because the Court of Appeal convicted him without conducting a proper hearing

.) - 67336/01 Decision 19.10.2004 [Section IV] Article 14 Discrimination Discrimination against employees, allegedly because of their trade-union membership: admissible The applicants worked as dockers

He submitted a medical certificate stating that on 23 September 2012 he had been hospitalised in the Nephrology Department of Slatina Hospital because of a renal colic.

Subsequently he was arrested because of this and taken to a labour institution.

attaqué, Mme X..., engagée le 30 avril 1970 par la société Laboratoires Sévigné où elle exerçait en dernier lieu les fonctions de directeur médical, est ensuite passée au service de la société SmithKline Beecham

3, for the last three years (section   9, subsection 1, 1 (d) of the Act) and because there were no special reasons, including concern for the unity of the family, to justify family reunion under

The Supreme Court (first instance jurisdiction) considered that the applicant’s detention was no longer justified because no new date had been set for her extradition and because the suspension of the