According to A, when she arrived at the Polyclinic she found that C was also there. She was surprised since she had not been informed that he would be present.

It noted that the applicant had not requested authorisation from the judicial authority or from M.M. before she broadcast the impugned images and sound of his hearing, as required by Article   88

She further argued that she had lived in the flat for over thirty-five years and that it could not be considered as a place she was occupying on a temporary basis.

She appealed. 10.     On 22 October 2003 the Moscow City Court, sitting as a court of appeal, satisfied her claim in part.

She contended that under the relevant law (see paragraph 16 below) the Regulations could only be adopted after the Government’s approval had been obtained. 11.

She had explained that she wished to be able to apply for the vacancies arising in 2011 since she had been unable to apply the previous year because her appraisal had not been carried out before she left

She further stated that she did not have a criminal record; she had two young children who lived with her.

as a Chamber composed of:   Elisabeth Steiner, President,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

She argued that prior to 1979 she had had no other option than to rent the property under title of temporary emphyteusis, in order to avoid it being requisitioned, as had been common at the time. 11.

She had been hospitalised on 30 October 2006 but as she had refused inpatient treatment, had behaved in a restrained manner and had undertaken to follow outpatient treatment, she had been allowed to leave

She submitted that she had bought another apartment at 33 Punane Street by means of a loan.

When asked by the social worker when she had last taken a bath, she shrugged and looked at her mother.

She further complained, under Article 13 of the Convention, that she had had no domestic remedy in that respect, arguing that her appeal against the provisional measure had never been decided.

She also sought payment of salary arrears in the period between 1   June 1997 and 11   February 1998. 16.

She stated that before the test purchase she had never bought drugs from the applicant; however, since they used to buy and consume them together she told the police that she would be able to convince

She was represented before the Court by Mr D. Smolić-Ročak, a lawyer practising in Rijeka. A.     The circumstances of the case 2.

“Possessions” can be either “existing possessions” or assets, including claims, in respect of which the applicant can argue that he or she has at least a “legitimate expectation” of obtaining effective

She stated that on the morning after the event J.N. had come to a bar where she worked and told her that she had been raped the evening before. She had been very distressed and frightened.

    The Government argued that the applicant did not have victim status, as she had failed to prove that she had actually paid the costs of her legal representation.