In 2004 Garegin Ghuyumchyan and the third applicant sold the family business to a private person. 10.

  Relying on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life), Ms Konstatinov complained about the threat of her being expelled from the Netherlands.

They rely on Articles   2 (right to life), 5 (right to liberty and security),   8 (right to respect for private and family life) and   13 (right to an effective remedy).

    Family Act 39.

    The Constitution guarantees to everyone the right to respect for his private life, personal and family secrets and the right to defend his honour and reputation (Article 23 § 1).

Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President,   Aleš Pejchal,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,   Armen

At., A.G.’s friend who also knew the applicant and the family, was interviewed.

.sBCA8018A { width:334.29pt; font-family:'Lucida Console'; font-size:10pt; font-weight:bold; display:inline-block } .s6D85FAC9 { width:300.62pt; font-family:'Lucida Console'; font-size:10pt; font-weight

The case concerns the domestic authorities’ decision to place O.D. in a family care centre following rib fractures noticed by physicians a few months after his birth and assumed to have been inflicted

display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block }       THIRD SECTION         CASE OF ALEXANDRU

    Regularisation of the residence status of the applicant’s family 32.

He argued that he had been born in Estonia, had spent all his life in that country and his family lived there. He did not pose any threat to his family. 14.

    The applicant argued that the non-renewal of his contract, on account of his personal and family situation, had breached his right to respect for his private and family life as guaranteed

The harvesting and transportation of the agricultural production became extremely problematic, the applicants and their family members being often humiliated when stopped at the checkpoints.

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

The case concerned proceedings in which the applicant requested that R’s family be evicted.

Thus, one of the absolute prerequisites of section 136(1) of the [Persons and Family Act] – a resolution for the founding the association – is missing.

The second applicant, Ms Alexandra Krejzová, was born in 1980 and lives in Prague. A.     Application lodged by Ms Šárka Dubská 7.

    The applicant complained that the provisional placement of her children in a children’s home violated her right to respect for her family life.