18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 73986/01 by Stanisław CZARNECKI against Poland

They relied on Article 57 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland which guarantees freedom of assembly. On 9 May 2009 the Constitutional Court refused to pursue the complaint.

En même temps, il ordonna sa détention préventive au titre de la procédure pénale en Pologne. B.

xa0;  de la requête No 14144/88                         présentée par Luciano POLLONE

  Poland, Juszczyszyn v.   Poland and Tuleya v.

The applicant received the highest number of votes in thirty polling stations, while H. received the highest number of votes in seven polling stations. 9.

  Poland , no.

Poland , 50020/06, § 40, 21 July 2009).

  Poland , no.

  Poland (dec.), no.   15212/03, §§   12-23, ECHR   2005-V and Ratajczyk v.   Poland (dec.), no.

Poland , no. 31330/02, §§ 27-33, 25 April 2006 and Celejewski v.   Poland , no. 17584/04, §§ 22-23, 4 August 2006. 27.

Poland , no.

Poland , no. 31330/02, §§ 27-33, 25 April 2006 and Celejewski v.   Poland , no. 17584/04, §§ 22-23, 4 August 2006. B.

  Poland case ([GC], no.   31443/96, ECHR 2004 ‑ V).

Poland no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V and Ratajczyk v. Poland no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII and the judgment in the case of Krasuski v. Poland , no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V.

  Poland , cited above, § 58). 31.

Poland judgment of 30 October 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VIII, p. 3376, § 47, and Humen v.   Poland [GC], no.   26614/95, § 60 unreported) . 31.

Poland , no. 21890/03, § 25, 6   September 2007; Kołodziński v. Poland , no. 44521/04, § 29, 8 January 2008; and Misiak v. Poland , no. 43837/06, § 18, 3 June 2008). 31.

Poland , no.   23042/02, §   49, 8 August 2006; Mianowski v. Poland , no.   42083/98, §   63, 16 December 2003).