CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

15 765 résultats pour « Pollono »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0907DEC004559809

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2010

7 septembre 2010

  45598/09 by Robert ORNAT against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on   7   September 2010 as a Committee composed of:   David Thór Björgvinsson,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0210DEC005958511

Admin. suprême

10 février 2015

10 février 2015

THE LAW On 23 September 2014 the Court received the following declaration signed by the applicant: “I, Mariusz Misztal, note that the Government of Poland are prepared to pay me, with a view to securing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214DEC004320709

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2010

14 décembre 2010

:inline-block } .s8AFA63C0 { width:219.11pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 43207/09 by Janusz BUŁATOWICZ against Poland

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-210648

Admin. suprême

25 mai 2021

25 mai 2021

avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } Published on 14 June 2021   FIRST SECTION Application no. 3020/20 Mariusz ORDAK against Poland

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0930DEC005902410

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2014

30 septembre 2014

inline-block } .s6820D92C { width:215.77pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 59024/10 Marek PODLECKI against Poland

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0531DEC002361810

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2011

31 mai 2011

THE LAW On 17   November   2010 the Court received the following declaration signed by the applicant: “I, Roman Olczak, note that the Government of Poland are prepared to pay me, with a  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0614DEC006045109

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2011

14 juin 2011

; display:inline-block } .sDF02943D { width:193.1pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 60451/09 by Piotr WOŚ against Poland

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0906DEC005495610

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2011

6 septembre 2011

THE LAW On 31 May 2011 the Court received the following declaration signed by the applicant: “I, Lidia Wieczorek, note that the Government of Poland are prepared to pay me, with a   view to securing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0906DEC005687109

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2011

6 septembre 2011

I accept the proposal and waive any further claims against Poland in respect of the facts giving rise to this application. I declare that this constitutes a final resolution of   the case.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0125DEC003735709

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2011

25 janvier 2011

THE LAW On 6 December 2010 the Court received the following declaration from the Government: “I, Jakub Wołąsiewicz, Agent of the Government, declare that the Government of Poland offer to pay, to Mr Andrzej

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224041

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2023

8 mars 2023

  Poland , no. 43447/19, 22 July 2021; Dolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v.   Poland , nos. 49868/19 and 57511/19, 8 November 2021; Advance Pharma sp. z o.o. v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0922DEC004440013

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2015

22 septembre 2015

THE LAW On 27 January 2015 the Court received the following declaration signed by the applicant: “I, Piotr Kozłowski, note that the Government of Poland are prepared to pay me, with a view to securing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011DEC006123808

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2011

11 octobre 2011

THE LAW On 1 February 2011 the Court received the following declaration signed by the applicant’s representative: “I, Lesław Szpala, note that the Government of Poland are prepared to pay to Mr  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920DEC000553910

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2011

20 septembre 2011

  THE LAW On 28   February   2011 the Court received the following declaration signed by the applicant:   “I, Rafał Ślesik, note that the Government of Poland are prepared to pay to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-165050

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2016

22 juin 2016

Poland (no. 20071/07, §§ 105-117, 17 April 2012) and Horych v. Poland (no. 13621/08, §§ 44-56, 17 April 2012).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1685

Admin. suprême

3 février 2009

3 février 2009

Poland - 45219/06 Judgment 3.2.2009 [Section IV] Article 46 Article 46-2 Execution of judgment Respondent State required to adopt further measures to eliminate structural problem of length of pre-trial

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0405DEC004954507

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2011

5 avril 2011

:inline-block } .s51F2D829 { width:208.44pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 49545/07 by Romana STACHOWSKA against Poland

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146090

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2014

7 juillet 2014

Poland (no. 20071/07, §§ 105-117, 17 April 2012), and Horych v. Poland (no. 13621/08, §§ 44-56, 17 April 2012).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0914DEC001341510

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2010

14 septembre 2010

display:inline-block } .s51F2D829 { width:208.44pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 13415/10 by Piotr DYGAS against Poland

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146045

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2014

7 juillet 2014

Poland (no. 20071/07, §§ 105-117, 17 April 2012), and Horych v. Poland (no 13621/08, §§ 44-56, 17 April 2012).

Source officielle

Page 130 sur 789

← PrécédentSuivant →