CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1015JUD002792910
15 octobre 2019
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 21 .
Page 13 sur 63777
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1016JUD000324306
16 octobre 2014
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0625JUD006354213
25 juin 2020
The relevant part of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention reads as follows: “3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0317JUD007761211
17 mars 2022
3), the alleged lack of justification for his pre-trial detention (Article 5 § 3), and the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings against him (Article 6 §§ 1 and 3) to the Azerbaijani Government
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0120JUD001757314
20 janvier 2022
Accordingly, this part of the application is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. (b) Article 5 § 3 29.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113JUD000164912
13 janvier 2015
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 §§ 3 AND 4 OF THE CONVENTION 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1104JUD000991613
4 novembre 2014
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 27.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0705JUD004392412
5 juillet 2018
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 26.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0606JUD002976909
6 juin 2017
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0609JUD001093218
9 juin 2022
The applicant complained under Article 5 § 3 that the length of his detention on remand had been excessive.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1018JUD002873909
18 octobre 2018
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0317JUD000254119
17 mars 2026
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 §§ 1 and 3 OF THE CONVENTION 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0225JUD001546823
25 février 2025
The case concerns complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, regarding the grounds for the applicant’s pre-trail detention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0604JUD003724513
4 juin 2020
Poland (no. 45219/06, §§ 26-27, 3 February 2009). THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 23.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1019JUD004825511
19 octobre 2017
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 23.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1216JUD002375507
16 décembre 2014
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 25.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0623JUD004592917
23 juin 2022
The applicant complained under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention about the lack of justification for his pre-trial detention. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0116JUD003464517
16 janvier 2020
They relied on Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 5 § 3 “3.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13127
9 février 2021
5 Article 5-3 Reasonableness of pre-trial detention Relevant but insufficient reasons in domestic court decisions for applicants’ continued pre-trial detention: violation [This summary also covers the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0226JUD003571022
26 février 2026
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 6. The applicants complained that their pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.