AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024DEC002421602
24 octobre 2006
24 octobre 2006
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0307DEC001278002
7 mars 2006
7 mars 2006
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0524DEC002498705
24 mai 2007
24 mai 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0506DEC000090104
6 mai 2008
6 mai 2008
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601DEC000024902
1 juin 2006
1 juin 2006
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0309DEC001764504
9 mars 2006
9 mars 2006
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0104DEC004208802
4 janvier 2007
4 janvier 2007
Early , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 17 October 2002, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0928DEC006471201
28 septembre 2004
28 septembre 2004
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601DEC004085504
1 juin 2006
1 juin 2006
Accordingly, the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should be discontinued and the case struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) and (b) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1208DEC001430803
8 décembre 2005
8 décembre 2005
Accordingly, the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should be discontinued and the case struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) and (b) of the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0427DEC003359402
27 avril 2004
27 avril 2004
Accordingly, the application to the case of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should be discontinued and the case struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0130DEC003963602
30 janvier 2007
30 janvier 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1107DEC006875501
7 novembre 2006
7 novembre 2006
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0616DEC000064003
16 juin 2005
16 juin 2005
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to this case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0706DEC000424202
6 juillet 2004
6 juillet 2004
Accordingly, the application to the case of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should be discontinued, and the case struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0912DEC001565003
12 septembre 2006
12 septembre 2006
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0711DEC002249105
11 juillet 2006
11 juillet 2006
Accordingly, the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention to the case should de discontinued and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0520DEC003720503
20 mai 2008
20 mai 2008
Par ailleurs, il convient de mettre fin à l’application de l’article 29 § 3 de la Convention et de rayer l’affaire du rôle.
Source officielleciv1
613723afcd5801467740ce71
3 avril 2001
3 avril 2001
Sainte-Rose, avocat général, et après en avoir délibéré conformément à la loi ; Sur la déchéance du pourvoi soulevée par la défense : Vu l'article 978 du nouveau Code de procédure civile, ensemble
Source officielle2EME ET 7EME SOUS-SECTIONS REUNIES
CETAT:CETATEXT000008221994
13 novembre 2006
13 novembre 2006
dispositions de l'article 293 de la loi du 2 juillet 1990 dispose : « Les fonctionnaires de France Télécom peuvent être intégrés sur leur demande jusqu'au 31 décembre 2009, dans les conditions prévues
Source officiellePage 13 sur 25551