The general principles to be applied in cases where a prosecution witness did not attend the trial and his statements previously made by him were admitted as evidence are well-established

    The Government did not make any submissions in this respect. 9.

The BCEA offered to make the payment not as compensation for expropriation, but on the basis of a contract of sale to be entered into by the applicant and an individual acting on behalf of the BCEA.

No appeal was made against this judgment which became final. THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE CONVENTION and of Article 1 of Protocol No . 1 to the Convention 9.

As the applicant had not submitted a claim for just satisfaction within the required time-limit, the Court made no such award. (The judgment is available only in English.)

    On 23 July 2005 the Town Council made a new offer of two flats to the applicant and his son.

    In the light of the applicant’s express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the parties may be considered to have reached a friendly settlement. 9.

The applicants had made use of the remedy available at the relevant time, and they could not be expected to reformulate their claim in the course of the proceedings.

Then the applicant was made sit on a chair and his feet were tied to the chair’s legs. The applicant felt being touched behind his ears.

Any application made under Articles 33 or 34 of the Convention shall be submitted in writing and shall be signed by the applicant or by the applicant’s representative. ... 3.

The fact is that in this case, strategic decisions on spending are made collectively.

The appellate court made no mention of the applicant’s particular complaints. 9.

    The Government asserted that the assessment of the criminal proceedings should not be made solely from the standpoint of whether the statements of the co-defendants had been made under duress

He argued that he had never asked the applicant to sign two contracts as alleged by her and she had never made any statement concerning money laundering at their meeting. 10 .

It was not prepared to make any submissions in respect of the other complaints. 45.     The Russian Government did not make any specific submissions. 46.

The Court reiterates that domestic courts must make reasonable efforts to summon the parties to a hearing (see Kolegovy v.   Russia , no.

    By letter of 4   October 2007, the widow of Mr Valentin Aleksandrovich Kvitov, Ms Dolores Fedorovna Kvitova, informed the Court that her husband had died on 11   April 2007 and

In the case of Valentina Vasilyeva v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mr   C.L. Rozakis , President ,   Mr   P.

Their complaints are similar to those made in the Burdov v. Russia case ( Burdov v. Russia , no.