On 19 October 2015 G.B. assaulted the applicant while on a street in Tbilisi. The police arrived, however, no proceedings were subsequently initiated.

The statements had also been concordant with the testimony of I.U. and her expenditure sheet, as well as with M.M.’s statements.

Moreover, in this respect the contracting States enjoy a certain margin of appreciation in assessing whether and to what extent differences in otherwise similar situations justify a difference in treatment

The area, consisting of 82.5 hectares belonging to the applicant, was expropriated by the State under a decision made by the Ministry on 24 July 2001.

In the case of VR-Bank Stuttgart eG v.

  The Court heard addresses by Mr Starmer and Mr Sales. 7.

It appears that M.G. was subsequently authorised to act on behalf of both the mayor and the State in connection with the planned expropriation process. 6 .

the Iraqis being beaten up while they were being put into a vehicle.

He saw other persons being beaten if they asked to read what they were signing or if they refused to sign.

In determining the amount of just satisfaction, the Constitutional Court, while noting that the applicant, as heir, was entitled to complain about the entire duration of the proceedings, took into account

On 28 July 2022, while the applicant was in pre-trial detention, the Croatian authorities ordered his detention on the basis of an arrest warrant issued by Bosnia and Herzegovina (“the requesting state

So, at the time when the applicant had been required to take an oath while in police custody, criminal charges had already been brought against him and he should accordingly have had the right to remain

In its recent case-law the Court of Cassation had reversed that is approach – which separated the merits and the execution – in favour of a global assessment of what constituted a reasonable time.

against San Marino lodged on 1 August 2025 communicated on 18 February 2026 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns administrative proceedings lodged by the applicant company (a first level start-up

  This judgment was quashed by the Federal Court (Bundesgerichtshof) and the case sent back to the Stuttgart Regional Court (Landgericht) for a new trial.

You don’t know what I say or what I believe. Some of you or most of you don’t know, or only know what the media dare to say about me, all those stupidities they attribute to revisionists.

But above and beyond what some people are learning in the final, public phase of the court hearings, the public must be told what goes on in secret behind the scenes of the political police and the special

    The applicant argued that when the police officer had taken his statement on 16 September 2014 he had informed him that the discussion concerned exclusively the offence of driving while suspended

What an insane State.”