CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-167431
21 septembre 2016
01/09/2006 39866/02 SHESTOPALOVA ET AUTRES 17/11/2005 12/04/2006 42383/02 SHEVCHENKO 10/04/2008 10/07/2008 9647/02 SHILYAYEV 06/10/2005 06/01/2006 21417/04 SHIRYAYEVA 13/07/2006 13/10/2006 10833/03 SHITIKOV
Page 13 sur 21
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0408JUD003927098
8 avril 2004
2298 ‑ 99, §§ 144 ‑ 50; Nikolova , cited above, §§ 49 ‑ 53; and Shishkov v. Bulgaria , no. 38822/97, §§ 52 ‑ 54, ECHR 2003-... (extracts)). 67.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0810JUD005538900
10 août 2006
officer[s] authorised by law to exercise judicial power” within the meaning of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see Assenov and Others , cited above, §§ 144-50; Nikolova , cited above, §§ 49-53, and Shishkov
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1212JUD005579220
12 décembre 2024
Russia , no. 33172/16, §§ 45-57, 28 May 2019) and where life prisoners were systematically handcuffed every time they left their cells ( see Shlykov and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0810JUD005685600
authorised by law to exercise judicial power and referred to the Court's findings in the cases of Assenov and Others (judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998 ‑ VIII), Nikolova (cited above), Shishkov
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD002992005
1 juillet 2014
The case of Mr Shmakov (application no. 3553/06 lodged on 28 December 2005) 19.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1026JUD005679600
26 octobre 2006
Bulgaria , judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998 ‑ VIII, p. 3298-99, § 144-50; Nikolova , cited above, §§ 49-53, and Shishkov v. Bulgaria , no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0626JUD000707706
26 juin 2018
Application no. 61400/11, Shipanov v. Russia 32. The police arrested the applicant at about 12 noon on 8 July 2011. His arrest record was drawn up at 9.25 p.m. 33.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0922JUD001243611
22 septembre 2015
Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria , no.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0625DEC008038017
25 juin 2020
47264/18 16/09/2018 Petr Nikolayevich LOGUNOV 03/06/1962 Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich Nizhniy Tagil IK-3 Sverdlovsk Region 29/12/2010 to 19/03/2018 7 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 20 day(s) 50 inmate(
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0126JUD000079714
26 janvier 2017
Au demeurant, la requérante ne prétend pas que les instructions du juge étaient arbitraires, incompréhensibles ou déraisonnables ( Shishkov c.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1102JUD003852116
2 novembre 2023
41766/18 15/08/2018 Yevgeniy Valeryevich BAZHUKOV 1984 Ezhvinskiy District Court of Syktyvkar 27/11/2019 7,500 42017/18 22/08/2018 Aleksandr Viktorovich ZOLOTAREV 1979 Shirokov
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1013JUD004559313
13 octobre 2015
xa0; Furthermore, Article 5 § 4 enshrines, as does Article 6 § 1, the right of access to a court, which can only be subject to reasonable limitations that do not impair its very essence (see Shishkov
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226247
10 juillet 2023
Convention on account of being taken forcibly to the hospital and the use of restraint measures during the actions undertaken on 21 December 2018 with a view to subjecting him to force-feeding (see Shlykov
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1102JUD001836918
xa0; 21607/19 05/04/2019 Dmitriy Maksimovich KARAPATS 1979 Smolninskiy District Court of St Petersburg 15/02/2019 7,500 23379/19 02/04/2019 Sergey Aleksandrovich MITSKEVICH 1991 Shirokov
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0907JUD007879617
7 septembre 2023
report, Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000 38533/20 14/08/2020 Leonid Leonidovich SHPAKOV
ECLI:CEDH:001-230547
11 janvier 2024
45278/22* 31/08/2022 Anton Dmitriyevich SHAPKO 1994 Sergey Sergeyevich Kulikov Nizhniy Novgorod Anti-war protests Nizhniy Novgorod 06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1130JUD005892500
30 novembre 2006
Bulgarie , précité §§ 79-83) et donc vérifier si la présomption a été appliquée dans le cas de l'espèce (voir Shishkov c. Bulgarie , n o 38822/97, § 60, 9 janvier 2003). 51.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0118JUD004790599
18 janvier 2007
être considérés comme des « magistrats habilités par la loi à exercer des fonctions judiciaires » au sens de l'article 5 § 3 de la Convention (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, l'affaire Shishkov
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0131DEC001081015
31 janvier 2017
42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 96-119, 10 January 2012, and Shishkov v. Russia , no. 26746/05, §§ 84-86, 20 February 2014 on remedies in respect of conditions of detention; Muminov v.