Furthermore, the applicant's new claims for compensation for the alleged injuries to his shoulder and ankle were rejected.

Serghides, President,   Anja Seibert-Fohr,   Peeter Roosma, judges, and Olga Chernishova, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to: the application (no.

Viktorovich RASPOPIN against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 1 July 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Darian Pavli, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Peeter

in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the convention relating to the applications lodged by Mr Francis Marritt, Mr George Tomkins, Mr T., Mr Benjamin Wilson, Mr Mark Louis Fischer, Mr David John Petty

against Russia   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 9   September 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Darian Pavli, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Peeter

against Turkey   The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 29   September 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Arnfinn Bårdsen, President,   Darian Pavli,   Peeter

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLEs 3 and 13 OF THE CONVENTION 20.

He alleged that the Clinic was not suitable for a blind person. Between 2013 and 2014 the applicant was involved in several work ‑ related disputes with the Clinic.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE CONVENTION 10.

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 13.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 5 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention concerning their alleged detention in the absence of a judicial order for a certain period of time and the alleged lack of justification

The Government submitted their observations, having disputed the violations alleged.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 3 and 13 of the Convention AND THE GOVERNMENT’S REQUEST TO STRIKE OUT THE APPLICATIONS 6.

    The application concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings against the applicant on account of his alleged inability to directly examine certain witnesses whose testimony had

Eventually, she helped the applicant to bring legal proceedings as regards the sale of the flat and the alleged intrusions therein. B.

He stated that he needed approximately EUR   2,000 per month to meet his needs.

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicants’ declaration Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros

The applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the alleged ill-treatment were communicated to the Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”).

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 2 OF THE CONVENTION 23.