CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Chambre Sociale
6711fafc7603bf88a1884bbd
15 octobre 2024
[J] [E] [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] Représenté par Me Emmanuelle RICHARD de l'AARPI VERDEAUX-RICHARD AARPI, avocat au barreau de CLERMONT-FERRAND APPELANT ET : S.A.S.
Page 13 sur 15
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0113JUD000274621
13 janvier 2026
enjoyment of the right to respect for private life (see Bédat v.
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:CR02667
31 octobre 2017
Y... qu'il était placé en garde à vue à compter de 22 heures 40 pour des faits de tentative de vol aggravé, commise à Bègle, le 12 mai 2016 ; que le gardé à vue a été entendu le 13 mai 2016 par les enquêteurs
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0829DEC000036218
29 août 2023
17502/07, §§ 101-04, 23 May 2016).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0210JUD005198708
10 février 2015
Merits 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1002JUD003602297
2 octobre 2001
A hearing on admissibility and merits (Rule 54 § 4) took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 16 May 2000.
Ch. Sociale -Section A
634f958fb5afe5adfff28a59
18 octobre 2022
L'ordonnance de clôture a été rendue le 24 mai 2022.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0510REP001918791
10 mai 1994
such manner as he may direct.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0301DEC004611399
1 mars 2010
Employment of personnel under this section may be on a contractual basis. The number of personnel employed in this manner shall be no more than ten.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0424JUD003681297
24 avril 2003
may override the parent's interest in reunion.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1025DEC001580902
25 octobre 2005
The applicant in application no. 25624/02, Idris Richard Francis, is a United Kingdom national who was born in 1939 and lives in Petersfield. They are represented before the Court by Mr J.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1019REP001663290
19 octobre 1992
MARXER 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0414JUD003006004
14 avril 2011
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Jendrowiak v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0516DEC003602297
16 mai 2000
They are represented before the Court by Mr Richard Buxton, a lawyer practising in Cambridge, England. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1105JUD004853999
5 novembre 2002
Section 76 provides: “(1) In any proceedings a confession made by an accused person may be given in evidence against him in so far as it is relevant to any matter in issue in
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1180569-1231906
9 novembre 2004
Spain (no. 77837/01) Violation of Article 6 § 1 The applicant, Ricardo Saez Maeso, is a Spanish national who was born in 1961 and lives in Valencia (Spain).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0708JUD003602297
8 juillet 2003
On 16 May 2000, following a hearing on admissibility and the merits (Rule 54 § 4, former version), it was declared admissible by a Chamber of that Section, composed of Mr J. P.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0717JUD002521815
17 juillet 2018
The Court considers that the issue of whether or not the applicants refused a change of cell may have implications for the admissibility or merits of their specific complaints; nevertheless
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0203JUD004479419
3 février 2026
Ricardo Bragança de Matos et M. Manuel Aires Magriço, procureurs, et M me Helena Martins Leitão, procureure générale adjointe.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0617JUD007071910
17 juin 2014
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Zamfirachi v.