in question.

The second applicant, Index.hu Zrt (“Index”) is a company limited by shares, seated in Budapest. It is the owner of one of the major Internet news portals in Hungary. 6.

1950 and is currently detained in HMP Whatton.

He was born in 1964 and lives in Edinburgh. He was represented before the Court by Mr A. Lothian, a lawyer practising in Edinburgh.

İnce, a lawyer practising in Istanbul. The Turkish Government (“the   Government”) did not designate an Agent for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court. 3.

  In the case of Rock Ruby Hotels Ltd v.

In the case of Hadjiprocopiou and Others v.

    Article 6   § 2 provides: “The amount of obligations expressed in zlotys in gold is calculated at 1 zloty for 1   zloty in gold.”

In the case of Sophia Andreou v.

(3) For the establishment of the value of pecuniary obligations referred to in the present Decree and expressed in the Polish currency, it is irrelevant what means of payment was in circulation at the

in the CIAIAC’s final report. 28.

der Haupverhandlung, nur unter grösster innerer Überwindung mitzuteilen   »).

in his stead.

    The first three applicants and the fourth applicant's late mother owned agricultural land in Noicattaro.

Kashamov, a lawyer practising in Sofia. 2.

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 March 1990.#Criminal proceedings against Gérard Fauque and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Cour d'appel de Versailles - France.

the inflation rate in the country.

  The Office referred, in this respect, to a decision of the Berlin Administrative Court of 27 January 1989 in a similar case.

    In July 2005 the applicants lodged an action for damages against the company which owned “CMA VGM ELBE” (“LACEY NAVIGATION Inc”), its representative in Greece (“DANAOS SHIPPING”), as well