the prosecution, and any doubt is to the benefit of the accused;   Whereas, moreover, the judges must permit the latter to produce evidence in rebuttal and, in their judgment, they can find him guilty

Netherlands - 30749/12 Judgment 14.2.2017 [Section III] Article 6 Article 6-3-c Defence in person Complete rehearing of case held in accused’s absence: violation Facts – In May 2007 the applicant was found guilty

On 22 December 2009 the Kharkiv Regional Court of Appeal, sitting as a court of first instance, found the applicant guilty of two counts of robbery and attempted murder and sentenced him to fifteen years

On 30 November 2018 the Supreme Court of Georgia overturned the applicant’s acquittal, finding her guilty of an assault and imposing a fine in the amount of 500 Georgian Laris (“GEL”).

The criminal law was applied to the applicant and he was found guilty and sentenced to a term of imprisonment.

    At the trial the applicant pleaded not guilty. He did not deny that he had had a fight with G., but denied stabbing him with a knife.

When the jury’s verdict is that the person is not guilty, but the court finds that he is undoubtedly guilty, the court may unanimously decide that the case shall be retried before other judges.

    On 26 November 2008 the Prague Regional Court found the applicant guilty of murder and sentenced him to life imprisonment.

If evidence of guilt existed, the person charged with a criminal offence had the right to rebut it. 44.

The municipality stated that it was not presuming the applicant’s guilt in the criminal case, but that even if she was not guilty the suspicions against her had a negative effect on the environment in

To impute criminal liability to a person was to reflect an opinion that he or she was guilty to the criminal standard of the commission of a criminal offence.

She invoked Article 6 § 2 of the Convention which reads as follows: “Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.”

guilt has been established by a court ( Konstas v.

2016, à la suite du refus opposé par le maire de Couesmes à sa demande de copie des documents suivants relatifs au chemin rural n° 21 du Mortier de Tulasne à la Roussière et au chemin n° 53 de la Guillerie

Consequently the prosecution has not discharged the burden of proving the guilt of the accused and only proved a prima facie or provable case.

according to law and declared guilty by an effective court judgment.

IMMOBILIERE 3 F [Adresse 2] [Localité 3] représentée par Maître Séverine GUILLUY de la SELEURL LAWRIZON AVOCAT, avocats au barreau de PARIS, vestiaire : C1100 En application des dispositions de l’article

  The applicant's solicitor entered a plea of not guilty and the trial was fixed for 25 March 1986.

    Having been officially indicted on 9   March   2009, the applicant pleaded not guilty at the ensuing trial. 9.