xa0; 5551/25 11/02/2025 Alexandru STROE 1967       Mioveni Prison 01/01/2020 pending More than 5 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 20 day(s)     5616/25 13/02/2025 Virgil-Constantin FIRAN

Türkiye 10/11/2021 Vasif ÖZTÜRK 1998 Mus Turkish 228. 56873/21 Firat v. Türkiye 04/11/2021 Alaattin FİRAT 1982 İzmir Turkish 229. 56961/21 Uzun v.

Türkiye 07/02/2019 Ercan FIRAT 04/01/1973 İrem TATLIDEDE Ordinary judge or public prosecutor HSYK decision 6. 11767/19 Z.E. v.

Dans l’évaluation de ces conséquences, la Cour examinera, en particulier, l’enjeu de la procédure nationale ou son issue ( Hebat Aslan et Firas Aslan c.

29/06/2015, 20/08/2015 to 17/11/2015, 17/06/2016 to 06/09/2016 and 06/10/2016 to 30/06/2017), bunk beds, insufficient number of sleeping places   5,000     58147/15 07/04/2016 Gheorghe Fira

, lorsque des autorités nationales ont octroyé à un requérant une indemnité en redressement de la violation constatée, il convient qu’elle en examine le montant (voir, parmi d’autres, Hebat Aslan et Firas

or belated notification of the detention decision; (iii) the lack of or delay in the examination of the objection against detention by the magistrates’ courts (compare, for example, Hebat Aslan and Firas

The Court considers that the sums granted to the applicants cannot be regarded as manifestly insufficient ( Hebat Aslan and Firas Aslan v.   Turkey , no. 15048/09, § 50, 28 October 2014). 20.

qu’une saisine de la Cour constitutionnelle relativement à l’article 5 § 4 de la Convention aurait été vaine en raison de l’incompétence ratione temporis de cette haute juridiction ( Hebat Aslan et Firas

decision of the 9th Assize Court cannot be simply ruled out, given in particular that that court made an explicit reference to the opinion and eventually ruled in accordance with it (see Hebat Aslan and Firas

inline-block } .sAAF48370 { width:22.55pt; display:inline-block } .sF52EF7EE { width:229.11pt; display:inline-block }       PREMIÈRE SECTION             AFFAIRE FIRAT

Turkey (applications no. 2668/07, 6102/08, 30079/08, 7072/09 and 7124/09)   THE AUTHORITIES FAILED IN THEIR DUTY TO PROTECT THE LIFE AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION OF THE JOURNALIST FIRAT (HRANT) DINK

The Court considers that the sums granted to the applicants cannot be regarded as manifestly insufficient ( Hebat Aslan and Firas Aslan v.   Turkey , no.

Roumanie (n o 2) , n o 66580/12, § 174, 2 octobre 2018   ; voir aussi   Hebat Aslan et Firas Aslan c. Turquie , n o 15048/09, §   44, 28   octobre 2014).

Baku Zaman MAHMUDOV Baku     Agali KHUDAYEV 1959 Baku Alla FATALIYEVA 1957 Baku Ilgar NOVRUZOV 1959 Baku Bashkhanim ABBASOVA 1948 Baku Shabeyim HUSEYNOVA 1957 Baku Ikmat MIRZAYEV 1960 Baku Fira

'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt }       FOURTH SECTION               CASE OF FIRTH

Sebaha GÜLERYÜZ 23/04/1967 Malatya Seyit İNCE 01/01/1971 Malatya Serap KARATAŞTAN 06/06/1972 Batman Adalet ÇAMUR 24/07/1969 Malatya Mesude ZENGİN 05/06/1969 Malatya Şadiye ÖZCAN 11/03/1966 Malatya Çiçek FIRAT

Dans l’évaluation de ces conséquences, la Cour examinera, en particulier, l’enjeu de la procédure nationale ou son issue ( Hebat Aslan et Firas Aslan c.

Türkiye 23/02/2022 İbrahim FIRAT 1979 Zonguldak Turkish Ahmet ÇAVUŞ 127. 12438/22 Akalan v. Türkiye 24/02/2022 Oktay AKALAN 1970 Samsun Turkish Betül Sena AKALAN 128. 12492/22 Korük v.