CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0111JUD003604502
11 janvier 2007
Damage 39. The applicant claimed 60,665 Russian roubles in respect of pecuniary damage.
Page 13 sur 118
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2487161-2704671
30 septembre 2008
It awarded Mr Işıldak EUR 1,000 for non-pecuniary damage. (The judgment is available only in French.) Violation of Article 8 Koç and Others v. Turkey (no. 38327/04) Nakçi v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0209JUD000538104
9 février 2010
On 30 November 2005, at the applicant’s request, the Constanţa District Court, by an interlocutory decision, declared that the judgment of 19 May 2005 could be enforced.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0212JUD001747204
12 février 2009
Damage 37.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1010JUD003218502
10 octobre 2013
Damage 34.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1023DEC006483901
23 octobre 2003
This sum (EUR 7,000) shall cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-434
26 juillet 2011
She lived in a constant state of anxiety and never left the house for fear of another attack. By 2003 she had become totally immobile.
Chambre 1-7
631ad8b139cffb4f136742f9
8 septembre 2022
SOGEFINANCEMENT C/ [L] [T] Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à : Me Sylvain DAMAZ Décision déférée à la Cour : Jugement du Tribunal d'Instance de GRASSE
0P1 P.proximité- ATF1
67f6bd99a9d5adc26061fc38
15 janvier 2024
Proximité JUGEMENT DU : 25 Mars 2024 Président : Madame LIEGEOIS, 1ère Vice-Présidente Greffier : Mme SCANNAPIECO, Débats en audience publique le : 15 Janvier 2024 GROSSE : Le 25/03/24 à Me DAMAZ
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1208JUD004082812
8 décembre 2015
Non-pecuniary damage “1.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-246045
16 octobre 2025
The applicant learnt about the damage from his neighbour on 27/07/2022. On 08/08/2022 the applicant lodged a complaint with the Ukrainian police.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0303DEC001363602
3 mars 2009
Had they been diligent in those proceedings, the action would have allowed them to recover from the State the indexed purchase price plus damages. 29.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0528DEC003296811
28 mai 2013
(6) In this section— ‘court’ includes a tribunal; ‘damages’ means damages for an unlawful act of a public authority; and ‘unlawful’ means unlawful under section 6 (1).”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1115JUD004921810
15 novembre 2012
Damage 71.
soc
613720abcd580146773ed407
19 juillet 1988
d'appel de Paris (18ème chambre, section A), au profit de l'ASSOCIATION POUR LA FORMATION PROFESSIONNELLE DANS LE BATIMENT ET LES TRAVAUX PUBLICS DE SEINE-ET-MARNE (AFOBAT), dont le siège est ... à Dammarie-les-Lys
PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1220869-1269342
17 décembre 2004
Mr Mazăre is mayor of Constanţa.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:0622JUD000261465
22 juin 1972
made constant medical care necessary.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0203JUD003262606
3 février 2011
Damage 38. In respect of her share in the flat, the first applicant claimed 49,600 euros (EUR) in pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0614JUD004304508
14 juin 2016
She claimed 25,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage from the driver and the Prosecutor’s Office.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0709DEC004221907
9 juillet 2015
to another shall render the person through whose fault the damage was caused liable to make reparation for it.”