Allemagne du 25 mars 1985, série A n o 90, pp. 21-23, paras. 44-51, et markt intern Verlag GmbH et Klaus Beermann c. Allemagne du 20 novembre 1989, série A n o 165, pp. 17-19, paras. 27-31).

D.H., arrêt Markt Intern Verlag GmbH et Klaus Beermann du 20 novembre 1989, série A n° 165, p. 17, par. 26).

Germany judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, pp. 21-23, paras. 45-48; Markt Intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 165, p. 18, para. 30).

D.H., arrêt Markt Intern Verlag GmbH et Klaus Beermann du 20 novembre 1989, série A n° 165, p. 17, par. 26).

European Court of Human Rights the Contracting States have a certain margin of appreciation in assessing the existence and extent of the necessity of an interference (see Markt Intern Verlag GmbH Klaus Beermann

Court H.R., judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, paras. 42 and 55) and the dissenting opinion of Judge Martens, approved by Judge Macdonald, in the case of Markt Intern Verlag Gmbh and Klaus Beermann

    The Court considers that the interference was prescribed by law, namely by sections 1 and 2 of the Unfair Competition Act (see markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v.

    11138/22 08/02/2022 Dmitriy Aleksandrovich MARKOV 1982   Daniil Borisovich Berman Moscow Rally Free Navalnyy   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000

application no. 14558/07), Ms   Luder (30166/07), Ms Polonetskaya (15437/08), Mr Lipkin (19447/08), Mr Sorkin (20857/08), Ms Margolina (20872/08), Mr Dybkin (22546/08), Ms Lamedman (25820/08), Mr Berman

Court H.R., Barthold judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, p. 22, para. 47; Markt Intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 165, pp. 18-19, para. 30).

Court H.R., Markt Intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 165, p. 17, paras 25 to 26).

Recommendation 1684(2004) and Resolution 1411(2004), both of 23/11/2004, and Resolution 1516(2006) of 2 October 2006, and also in several parliamentary questions: by Mr Jurgens, No. 13 of 05/10/2004, Ms Bemelmans-Videc

Danemark , 22 février 1989, série A n o 149]   ; markt intern [ Verlag GmbH et Klaus Beermann c. Allemagne , 20 novembre 1989, série A n o 165]   ; Chorherr [ c.

  Royaume ‑ Uni (n o 1 ) (26 avril 1979, série A n o 30) et markt intern Verlag GmbH et Klaus Beermann c. Allemagne (20 novembre 1989, série   A n o   165).

Les États disposent également d’une large marge d’appréciation s’agissant de réglementer le discours commercial et publicitaire ( markt intern Verlag GmbH et Klaus Beermann c.

Germany judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, pp. 21-23, paras. 45-48; Markt Intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 165, p. 18, para. 30).

Court H.R., markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 165, p. 17 paras. 25 - 26).

lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     11138/22 08/02/2022 Dmitriy Aleksandrovich MARKOV 1982 Berman

Germany (no. 15088/89), judgment of 23 June 1994, Series A 291-A, p. 14, § 26; markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v.