CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

29 963 résultats pour « Bechaud »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-205936

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2020

12 octobre 2020

The Schleswig-Holstein Court of Appeal rejected the applicant’s appeals as inadmissible because the applicant had been transferred from Lübeck to Bruchsal prior to the filing of his appeals.

Source officielle

Page 13 sur 1499

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9475

Admin. suprême

13 mai 2014

13 mai 2014

However, the Court held that the applicant, in arguing that the confiscation order was an abuse of process and oppressive because it was disproportionate in light of Article   1 of Protocol No.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-216645

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2022

1 mars 2022

In April 2020 the Deputy Minister rejected a new application for deferment of expulsion because the BMA reported that treatment was now available in Liberia.

Source officielle
CA

1ère chambre civile A

603354ad2e147d05b938dedf

Appel

6 juillet 2017

6 juillet 2017

Signé par Jean-Louis BERNAUD, président, et par Sylvie BOURRAT, greffier-en-chef, auquel la minute a été remise par le magistrat signataire. **** Par acte du 26 octobre 2012, il a été consenti à la

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-201929

Admin. suprême

24 février 2020

24 février 2020

The applicant alleged that the pre-trial judge proceedings were unfair and breached his rights guaranteed by Article 6 of the Convention because they were not adversarial, took place in chambers, in his

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-226033

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2023

27 juin 2023

According to the official records, the applicant was arrested because he had violated public order by illegally distributing leaflets and, when requested to stop, he had been rude towards the police.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0225JUD002482706

Admin. suprême

25 février 2010

25 février 2010

Four hearings were adjourned because the parties amended their claims. On one occasion the proceedings were postponed because the judge was on sick leave. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1009JUD002108806

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2008

9 octobre 2008

They were adjourned either because the parties failed to appear or because the judge was on sick leave. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404DEC003846214

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2017

4 avril 2017

The State Attorney’s Office argued that the document was irrelevant because a certificate on unpaid tax liabilities could not be proof of earnings. 18.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1009JUD000550706

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2008

9 octobre 2008

Of these, the hearing of 6   August was adjourned until 29 October because the parties did not appear.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1005JUD002951004

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2006

5 octobre 2006

were adjourned because witnesses defaulted and seven were postponed due to the applicant's illness. 19.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0412JUD004135498

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2001

12 avril 2001

    On 6 June 1991 the examination of the appeal was further adjourned because the applicant’s lawyer was on strike. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708DEC005839100

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2004

8 juillet 2004

The hearing was adjourned because Mr   E.’s lawyer was absent for a valid reason.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1017JUD003464914

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2023

17 octobre 2023

    On 31 October 2013 the Constitutional Court, in a formation of eight judges, dismissed without prejudice the applicant company’s complaint because its vote was tied.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0731JUD002209404

Admin. suprême

31 juillet 2008

31 juillet 2008

Third, the applicant had refused the voucher, because of slim chances that the voucher would have been provided promptly, because the voucher had not covered the price of a flat, and because the applicant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0506DEC001161985

Admin. suprême

6 mai 1986

6 mai 1986

  COMPLAINTS   The applicant complains that he will be expelled to Morocco because he was sentenced to two months' imprisonment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0926DEC000838507

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2017

26 septembre 2017

    The Government argued that the complaint was inadmissible because the applicant had abused her right of petition and because she had ceased to be a victim of the alleged violation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-154052

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2015

2 avril 2015

The applicant then requested that they all drive to the police station because he wanted to speak to the officers’ manager.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0116JUD006046900

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2007

16 janvier 2007

His claim for widows’ benefits was made on 18 July 2000 and was rejected on 28 July 2000 on the ground that he was not entitled to widow’s benefits because he was not a woman.

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 5 - Chambre 5

6035e4d7bbb7f04b03cb49a7

Appel

4 février 2016

4 février 2016

La société Izi Trading, qui bénéficiait d'un contrat de licence, a pu dès lors concéder un contrat de sous-licence à la société Because, laquelle a fourni les articles querellés à la société Fnac.

Source officielle