CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205936
12 octobre 2020
The Schleswig-Holstein Court of Appeal rejected the applicant’s appeals as inadmissible because the applicant had been transferred from Lübeck to Bruchsal prior to the filing of his appeals.
Page 13 sur 1499
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9475
13 mai 2014
However, the Court held that the applicant, in arguing that the confiscation order was an abuse of process and oppressive because it was disproportionate in light of Article 1 of Protocol No.
ECLI:CEDH:001-216645
1 mars 2022
In April 2020 the Deputy Minister rejected a new application for deferment of expulsion because the BMA reported that treatment was now available in Liberia.
1ère chambre civile A
603354ad2e147d05b938dedf
6 juillet 2017
Signé par Jean-Louis BERNAUD, président, et par Sylvie BOURRAT, greffier-en-chef, auquel la minute a été remise par le magistrat signataire. **** Par acte du 26 octobre 2012, il a été consenti à la
ECLI:CEDH:001-201929
24 février 2020
The applicant alleged that the pre-trial judge proceedings were unfair and breached his rights guaranteed by Article 6 of the Convention because they were not adversarial, took place in chambers, in his
ECLI:CEDH:001-226033
27 juin 2023
According to the official records, the applicant was arrested because he had violated public order by illegally distributing leaflets and, when requested to stop, he had been rude towards the police.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0225JUD002482706
25 février 2010
Four hearings were adjourned because the parties amended their claims. On one occasion the proceedings were postponed because the judge was on sick leave. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1009JUD002108806
9 octobre 2008
They were adjourned either because the parties failed to appear or because the judge was on sick leave. 7.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404DEC003846214
4 avril 2017
The State Attorney’s Office argued that the document was irrelevant because a certificate on unpaid tax liabilities could not be proof of earnings. 18.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1009JUD000550706
Of these, the hearing of 6 August was adjourned until 29 October because the parties did not appear.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1005JUD002951004
5 octobre 2006
were adjourned because witnesses defaulted and seven were postponed due to the applicant's illness. 19.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0412JUD004135498
12 avril 2001
On 6 June 1991 the examination of the appeal was further adjourned because the applicant’s lawyer was on strike. 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708DEC005839100
8 juillet 2004
The hearing was adjourned because Mr E.’s lawyer was absent for a valid reason.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1017JUD003464914
17 octobre 2023
On 31 October 2013 the Constitutional Court, in a formation of eight judges, dismissed without prejudice the applicant company’s complaint because its vote was tied.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0731JUD002209404
31 juillet 2008
Third, the applicant had refused the voucher, because of slim chances that the voucher would have been provided promptly, because the voucher had not covered the price of a flat, and because the applicant
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0506DEC001161985
6 mai 1986
COMPLAINTS The applicant complains that he will be expelled to Morocco because he was sentenced to two months' imprisonment.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0926DEC000838507
26 septembre 2017
The Government argued that the complaint was inadmissible because the applicant had abused her right of petition and because she had ceased to be a victim of the alleged violation.
ECLI:CEDH:001-154052
2 avril 2015
The applicant then requested that they all drive to the police station because he wanted to speak to the officers’ manager.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0116JUD006046900
16 janvier 2007
His claim for widows’ benefits was made on 18 July 2000 and was rejected on 28 July 2000 on the ground that he was not entitled to widow’s benefits because he was not a woman.
Pôle 5 - Chambre 5
6035e4d7bbb7f04b03cb49a7
4 février 2016
La société Izi Trading, qui bénéficiait d'un contrat de licence, a pu dès lors concéder un contrat de sous-licence à la société Because, laquelle a fourni les articles querellés à la société Fnac.