Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

    With regard to the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, it considered that the applicant’s removal to Russia would constitute an interference with his family life, since the

Prebensen   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos Acting Deputy Registrar   President               APPENDIX   No.

    The Association had intervened in a family dispute between a certain D.O. and his wife C.O. following a request for help from the latter.

xa0; §   4 (right to have lawfulness of detention decided speedily), in view of the length of proceedings before the Romanian courts; a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family

    In 2000 Mr M. left his house and the Damayev family unlawfully moved into it. 13.

    The applicant was allowed to telephone his family on several occasions. The internal regulations did not provide for the right to a family visit. 2.

1958 Picerno (Pz) Nicolò CAMMARATA 1960 Alcamo (Tp) Rocco CAPANO 1962 Deliceto (Fg) Vincenzo D’AMICO 1958 Cerami (En) Rinaldo DATA 1968 Carignano (To) Francesco DISANTO 1964 Grumo Appula (Ba) Antonio FANELLI

Colonel Drăghici had also fired at Costică Moldovan and his family as they tried to return home to fetch their pigs.

Having regard to the close family ties and the heirs’ legitimate interest in pursuing the application, the Court accepts that the deceased applicant’s heirs may pursue the application in his stead (see

    On the same day the applicant was admitted to the Alexandru Obregia Psychiatric Hospital in Bucharest.

    Having regard to the close family ties and the heir’s legitimate interest in pursuing the application, as well as to its relevant case-law on the matter (see Văleanu and Others v.

Under Article 754 of the ABGB illegitimate children could not inherit ab intestato from their father or father’s family.

    The family links of the applicants and the deceased 8 .

The foster family lived in a village situated about 50 km from the applicant’s home town, which is in the South of Finland. 7.

’ right to respect for their family life.

The applicant’s uncle had later called him and threatened to kill him if he returned to Libya, since he had shamed the family.

She relied on Articles 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and 13 (right to an effective remedy) and Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 (freedom of movement).

The Government accordingly appointed Alejandro Saiz Arnaiz to sit as an ad hoc judge (Article 27 § 2 of the Convention, as then in force, and Rule 29 § 1 of the Rules of Court). 6.