CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0209JUD005083720
9 février 2023
He relied on Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “Everyone arrested or detained in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 (c) of this Article shall be brought
Page 12 sur 63777
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1027JUD007463317
27 octobre 2022
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 of the Convention 6. The applicants complained of the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1204JUD001399105
4 décembre 2014
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 30.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0706JUD002029316
6 juillet 2023
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118JUD001392117
18 janvier 2024
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 of the Convention 5. The applicants complained of the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0709JUD003226419
9 juillet 2024
In these respects, he claimed that there had been a violation of Article 5 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0312JUD004539211
12 mars 2015
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 24.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0210JUD002417814
10 février 2022
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 of the Convention 6. The applicants complained principally of the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0219JUD005474912
19 février 2015
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0211JUD003368205
11 février 2014
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1001JUD004292110
1 octobre 2019
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1018JUD001533316
18 octobre 2018
Poland (no. 45219/06, §§ 26-27, 3 February 2009). THE LAW I. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 23.
CASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-10347
6 novembre 2014
Allemagne - 67522/09 Arrêt 6.11.2014 [Section V] Article 5 Article 5-3 Durée de la détention provisoire Plus de cinq ans passés en détention provisoire en raison de difficultés pour obtenir des preuves
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1019JUD003771417
19 octobre 2023
Rasulov, a lawyer based in Azerbaijan. 3. The Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applicant’s complaint under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113JUD002733513
13 novembre 2014
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011JUD002272708
11 octobre 2016
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0110JUD006303810
10 janvier 2017
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0607JUD003519505
7 juin 2016
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 17.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10491
16 décembre 2014
5 Article 5-3 Reasonableness of pre-trial detention Pre-trial detention for two-and-a-half months followed by house arrest for seven-and-a-half months: case referred to the Grand Chamber The applicant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1001JUD007552413
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 15.