Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0523DEC007570301
23 mai 2006
23 mai 2006
Dollé, greffière de section , Vu la requête susmentionnée introduite le 11 octobre 2000, Vu la décision de la Cour de se prévaloir de l’article 29 § 3 de la Convention et d’examiner conjointement la recevabilité
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1108DEC001506203
8 novembre 2005
8 novembre 2005
Naismith, greffier adjoint de section , Vu la requête susmentionnée introduite le 23 avril 2003, Vu la décision de la Cour de se prévaloir de l’article 29 § 3 de la Convention et d’examiner conjointement
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1016DEC003803304
16 octobre 2007
16 octobre 2007
Early , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 30 July 2004, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1211DEC001564706
11 décembre 2008
11 décembre 2008
; Giorgio Malinverni, George Nicolaou, judges, and Søren Nielsen, Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 27 January 2006, Having regard to the decision to apply Article
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0630DEC004968799
30 juin 2005
30 juin 2005
Quesada, greffier adjoint de section , Vu la requête susmentionnée introduite le 11 juin 1999, Vu la décision de la Cour de se prévaloir de l’article 29 § 3 de la Convention et d’examiner conjointement
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1130DEC000711803
30 novembre 2006
30 novembre 2006
Nielsen , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 5 February 2003, Having regard to the decision to apply the procedure under Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0511DEC001847404
11 mai 2006
11 mai 2006
Nielsen , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 30 March 2004, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0927DEC000484906
27 septembre 2007
27 septembre 2007
Nielsen , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 10 January 2006, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0105DEC004248302
5 janvier 2006
5 janvier 2006
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024DEC001532702
24 octobre 2006
24 octobre 2006
Elens-Passos, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 22 May 2001, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0919DEC006875601
19 septembre 2006
19 septembre 2006
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0629DEC003515002
29 juin 2006
29 juin 2006
Accordingly, the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention to the case should de discontinued and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601DEC001977202
1 juin 2006
1 juin 2006
Nielsen, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 3 May 2002, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0507DEC000664203
7 mai 2009
7 mai 2009
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0914DEC003837402
14 septembre 2006
14 septembre 2006
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0914DEC001232403
14 septembre 2006
14 septembre 2006
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out f the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1106DEC000610304
6 novembre 2008
6 novembre 2008
In view of the above-mentioned, it is appropriate to discontinue the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and to strike the case out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0112DEC000843302
12 janvier 2006
12 janvier 2006
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0705DEC000313103
5 juillet 2007
5 juillet 2007
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0301DEC006198300
1 mars 2005
1 mars 2005
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officiellePage 12 sur 25551