CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 285 résultats pour « Valentin MACE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1127JUD004456011

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2018

27 novembre 2018

    Proceedings brought by the adult male applicants 27.

Source officielle

Page 12 sur 65

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1022DEC001402806

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2019

22 octobre 2019

On 3 May 1984 the Istanbul Revenue Office responded to the Ministry, noting that the lump sum sent by the latter had not been sufficient to make all of the payments listed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0131JUD000137714

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2023

31 janvier 2023

They did not however consider that the refusal of treatment had been formulated by adult followers of the movement having the capacity to make medical decisions for themselves. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0920JUD001298715

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2016

20 septembre 2016

The doctors concluded that the applicant’s medical condition made him eligible for early release. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619DEC006385211

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2018

19 juin 2018

In that judgment it found a violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 because of the applicants’ inability to vote in a number of concrete past elections in respect of which they had made specific complaints

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0531DEC002910613

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2016

31 mai 2016

    Dr G.N. and M.M., respectively the doctor and the male nurse on duty that night, gave statements before the prosecutor in charge of the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0614DEC004240909

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2011

14 juin 2011

margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA68D9128 { width:171.94pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 42409/09 by Valentin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1015DEC000040612

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2020

15 octobre 2020

THE LAW The Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a unilateral declaration with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0629DEC006331213

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2023

29 juin 2023

The Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a unilateral declaration with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0621JUD002779003

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2007

21 juin 2007

The courts are called upon to examine their arguments in a fair and adversarial manner and make their assessment of the claim.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11254

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2016

28 juin 2016

In that context the Bulgarian authorities had taken the reports made by the applicant association seriously despite the fact that the latter had no formal status in the domestic proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121DEC000052216

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2021

21 janvier 2021

On 18 March 2018, the Government made a request to restore the application to the Court’s list of cases, as in the course of the proceedings to enforce the Court’s decision, they were informed that the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408DEC005961318

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2021

8 avril 2021

is established that the next-of-kin or heir may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case (see   Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1105DEC002961209

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2009

5 novembre 2009

The judge makes a decision to transmit the application for supervisory review by the relevant instance or to refuse to do so (Article 381   §   2).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224597

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2023

5 avril 2023

medical assistance (see   Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1213JUD000281404

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2007

13 décembre 2007

By its terms the Government undertook to give her a Russian-made VAZ passenger car. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0710JUD000375211

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2018

10 juillet 2018

They noted that the applicants had chanted the slogan “We have paid a price; we will make them pay a price”, and thereby incited to violence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1015JUD002324303

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2009

15 octobre 2009

    On 29   August 2002 the District Court asked the applicant to make written submissions in connection with his claims.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0412JUD000331106

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2007

12 avril 2007

However, no attempts were made to execute the judgment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0430JUD000131320

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2026

30 avril 2026

As evidence he submitted copies of several articles which had been published on the internet before he had made his statement.

Source officielle