The parties did not provide the Court with copies of the decisions in those other proceedings. 9.

The impugned interference was intended to combat money laundering and related criminal offences, thus pursuing the legitimate aim of the prevention of disorder and the prevention of crime.

Article   8 was thus applicable.

The bodies could thus be seen by a number of soldiers.

The reasoning in those cases was identical to that provided in the judgment II GOK   2/18. RELEVANT LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND PRACTICE 25.

individuals had not been sufficiently individualised to allow their personal circumstances to be balanced against those of the adult female applicants.

  Those factual allegations had amounted to an assertion that T.A. had committed serious criminal offences, including embezzlement and corruption.

They argued, inter alia , that each of them, as a member of a minority, had been personally affected by those statements.

They argued, inter alia , that each of them, as a member of a minority, had been personally affected by those statements.

The applicant company could not thus rely on editorial confidentiality.

Those comprised revenues received as special-purpose financing, including grants.

Law – Article 7: The purported offence was of a criminal character and thus attracted the guarantees of Article   7.

Unlike the applicants in those judgments, however, the present applicant belonged to one of the “constituent peoples”, and thus had a constitutional right to participate in elections to the Presidency.

He unsuccessfully brought proceedings for the restoration of his legal capacity and thus was unable to vote in the 2017 parliamentary elections.

The courts had not taken those circumstances into consideration.

The Ministry should seek the consent of those concerned before revealing any data. c) Since 2000, the medical reports of those future conscripts who have been diagnosed as suffering from drug or alcohol

No costs were thus awarded in that part.

Thus there had been no compelling reasons which could have justified the restrictions on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer.