It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible. B.     Merits 21.

Lastly, the European Court of Justice considered that a directive precluded the system of equivalence in issue, and the Conseil d'Etat , taking into account the ruling of that court, found that the decree

Even though that power of attorney stated that the applicant’s brother empowered the lawyer to represent himself, it is clear that this was an obvious error since that lawyer represented the applicant

The Court of Cassation held that that the fact that they had played or sung a song in Kurdish did not constitute propaganda in violation of the law and that they should be acquitted of the charges against

None of the investigating or trial judges in the case had questioned this key witness, who had denied that there had been an attempt to escape followed by a fight.

They pointed out that the applicant had a permanent place of residence and employment in Moscow and that her health had deteriorated as a consequence of being detained in the police cell. 21.

He found that the search warrant had contained specific indications as to what items had to be searched for and seized; he did not see any grounds to consider that there had been an unjustified interference

For example, they stated that the applicant had not provided any evidence that the mayor was schizophrenic. 5 .

They had also observed that these rights deserved equal protection and that, in those circumstances, a balancing exercise had to be carried out.

    The Secretary of State acknowledged in the proceedings that there was not a significant risk that the applicant would commit further violent offences, but asserted that he could lawfully

    The Court further notes that in Guravska it has already found that the Government had proved the effectiveness and availability in theory and practice of a compensatory remedy for the length

that at that date she was aware of the content of the decision.

    The applicants emphasised that there had been no breakdown, let alone one of a permanent nature, of their marriage – they had merely not cohabited for a period of six to seven months.

They submitted further that the Zagreb Municipal Court was constantly facing problems of excessive workloads, as each judge in the civil division of that court was dealing with more than 1,000 cases. 59

Consequently, they have lasted more than fifteen years and nine months. 26.

They were informed that they would be strip-searched and that if they refused they would be denied their visit to Mr O’Neill.

was firm evidence that they were involved in the LTTE.

As regarded the substance of his complaints, they submitted that the applicant had to show not just that the general situation in relation to human rights in Iran was less than satisfactory but that he

Taking into account around ten criteria that have been developed through theory and practice, one may conclude that in the instant case the prescribed penalty is a key factor which is relevant to the question