CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

438 résultats pour « Steven Calot »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-68470

Admin. suprême

23 février 2005

23 février 2005

The passage of time remains an influencing factor in that it can inevitably affect the availability of witnesses, exhibits and documentation, but it cannot be used in itself as a bar to reinvestigation

Page 12 sur 22

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0515DEC002136393

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1995

15 mai 1995

is rejected, also if the      request would aim at the hearing of these witnesses in disguise,      since recognition of the witnesses at the public hearing cannot

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1124DEC003818002

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2009

24 novembre 2009

display:inline-block } .s25347E17 { width:182.43pt; display:inline-block } .s92A1A400 { width:0.97pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 38180/02 by Stefan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0524DEC000447570

Admin. suprême

24 mai 1971

24 mai 1971

The subsequent events cannot in any way justify a different conclusion.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD001973217

Admin. suprême

16 février 2021

16 février 2021

Since 19 May 1987 the association has been operating under a permit granted by the Provincial Executive ( Gedeputeerde Staten ) of the Province of Gelderland which allows the motocross track to operate

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1976:0206JUD000561472

Admin. suprême

6 février 1976

6 février 1976

In the sphere of work and employment conditions, the Convention cannot impose upon the State obligations that are not incumbent upon private employers.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0116DEC001991213

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2018

16 janvier 2018

inline-block } .s91F6AE57 { font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 19912/13 Adam Stefan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129DEC004560099

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2002

29 janvier 2002

Members of the Netherlands Parliament ( Staten-Generaal ) have shown doubts as to the legitimacy of that unequal treatment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216DEC002513094

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 1999

16 décembre 1999

  It cannot therefore be maintained that they have obtained "redress" for the violation of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102JUD004172306

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2010

2 novembre 2010

[The applicant’s] objection that his action was excusable in the light of the Convention cannot therefore be accepted.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1015JUD002565022

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2024

15 octobre 2024

For that reason, your client cannot appeal against the decision. This follows from section 1018e(3) of the Administration of Justice Act.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0403JUD004172306

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2012

3 avril 2012

[The applicant’s] objection that his conduct was excusable in the light of the Convention cannot, therefore, be accepted.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129DEC004561899

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2002

29 janvier 2002

  Members of the Netherlands Parliament ( Staten-Generaal ) have shown doubts as to the legitimacy of that unequal treatment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0330DEC005940300

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2004

30 mars 2004

Pursuant to section 50 of the Security Protection Ordinance, decisions made in accordance with the Ordinance cannot be appealed against.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0405DEC001611590

Admin. suprême

5 avril 1995

5 avril 1995

She considers that in particular having regard to what was at stake and to her advanced age such a period of time cannot be considered to be reasonable.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0329JUD003404402

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2010

29 mars 2010

Stoven , Research Officer for the economic and tourist     development of beaches, and Litigation Officer,     Natural Maritime Public Property Litigation     Department,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0416DEC003204796

Admin. suprême

16 avril 1998

16 avril 1998

that on 21 May 1992 the applicant and other property owners, on whose properties a pump unit was to be placed, contested the municipality's intention before the National Board for Water and Sewage (Statens

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1022DEC003090496

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 1997

22 octobre 1997

  He is retired and resides in Staten Island, USA.   Before the Commission the applicant is represented by H. Bognerová, a lawyer practising in Trencín.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111073

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2012

10 avril 2012

sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s85226119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt }       THIRD SECTION Application no. 50157/06 Stefan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0223DEC004592499

Admin. suprême

23 février 1999

23 février 1999

    On 5 September 1994 the National Immigration Board ( Statens invandrarverk ) rejected the applicant’s request and ordered his deportation to Croatia.

Source officielle