Santangelo   conseillers   ; –     Falgest S.r.l. et M. Filippo Gironda M es   A.G. Lana ,   A. Saccucci ,   conseils , M.   A. Sangiorgi M me   G.

What is decisive is whether the fear can be held to be objectively justified (see Ferrantelli and Santangelo v.

Court H.R., Holm judgment of 25 November 1993, Series A no. 279-A, p. 14, para. 30 and, mutatis mutandis, No. 19874/92, Ferrantelli and Santangelo v. Italy, Comm. Report 2.3.95, unpublished).

admitted as evidence without the defence being given an opportunity to cross-examine this witness in person (see, for example, Al-Khawaja and Tahery, cited above, §§ 103, 121 and 153; Ferrantelli and Santangelo

    Le requérant est né en 1946 et réside à Sant’Angelo In Campo (Lucques). A.     La «   lettre circulaire   » du requérant 6 .

A et de Me Santangemo pour la commune de Poissy. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.

The Court’s task is to ascertain whether the proceedings as a whole, including the way in which the evidence was taken, were fair (see, among other authorities, the Ferrantelli and Santangelo v.

  60018/00, §   44, 8 June 2006, and Ferrantelli and Santangelo v. Italy , 7 August 1996, §   52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 ‑ III).

C et Mme B, celles de Me Santangelo, substituant Me Rivoire, représentant la commune de Toulouse et celles de Me Cayssials, représentant la société Saint-Agne Immobilier.

Secteur du Mont Sant'Angelo : 40.

What is decisive is whether the fear can be held to be objectively justified (see Ferrantelli and Santangelo v. Italy , 7   August 1996, §   58, Reports 1996 ‑ III, and Wettstein v.

What is decisive is whether this fear can be held to be objectively justified (see Wettstein , cited above, § 44; and Ferrantelli and Santangelo v.

  Switzerland , cited above, § 44; and Ferrantelli and Santangelo v.   Italy , judgment of 7   August 1996, Reports 1996 ‑ III, pp.   951-952, §   58). 53.

What is decisive is whether the fear can be held to be objectively justified (see Ferrantelli and Santangelo v. Italy , judgment of 7 August 1996, Reports 1996-III, pp. 951-52, § 58, and Wettstein v.

The Court's task is to ascertain whether the proceedings considered as a whole, including the way in which the evidence was taken, were fair (see, e.g., Ferrantelli and Santangelo v.

xa0;     62454/10 07/08/2010 Pasquale SPAGNUOLO 26/12/1955 Montefredane Massimo FERRARO              62455/10 07/08/2010 Dora SANTANGELO

Izaguirre, conseillère, - les conclusions de Mme Morisset, rapporteure publique, - et les observations de Me Ziemendorf, représentant le Comité de Défense, d'Action et de Sauvegarde d'Avon, de Me Santangelo

  33958/96, §   44, ECHR 2000 ‑ XII; and Ferrantelli and Santangelo v.   Italy , judgment of 7   August 1996, Reports 1996-III, pp.   951-52, §   58).

  [1] no. 22349/06, judgment of 24 June 2010 [2] See partly dissenting opinion of Judge De Meyer in the case of Ferrantelli and Santangelo v. Italy , judgment of 7 August 1996.