2022   FIRST SECTION Application no. 48781/19 Zbigniew KOSTKA against Poland lodged on 9 March 2020 communicated on 10 March 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the protection

    The Court notes that in its decision no. 3-537 (VD) of 30 March 2007 the Court of Cassation had expressed a finding of principle as regards the determination of the issue of existence of

authorities did not contain any statement calling into doubt their findings (see paragraph 17 above). 39.

    Having regard to the Court’s findings in respect of the kind of deprivation of liberty to which the applicant was subjected (see Blokhin v.   Russia [GC], no.

    What actions did investigator Ch. take during the period from 25   February 2014 to 25 March 2014 in order to establish the circumstances of A.’s death?

On 23 February 2011 the Court contacted the Teleorman Bar Association seeking their help in finding suitable counsel for the applicant.

On 17 March 2011 the Sabail District Court granted SOCAR’s claim and dismissed the applicant’s counter-claim finding that the house had been unlawfully built on State-owned land allocated to SOCAR in 1962

    On 19 February 2014 and 11 March 2015 the Supreme Court dismissed the applicant’s appeals on points of law against the lower courts’ judgments. 8.

  The Government filed their memorial on 8 March.   The Delegate of the Commission did not submit written observations.   5.

The identified police officers were charged in January, February and March 1997.

    On 9 March 2009 the President of the Fourth Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government.

On 6 March 2006 the Inspectorate, having conducted a fresh on-site supervision, concluded that the Practice complied with its order of 15   February 2006.

Croatia , no. 38359/13, §§ 67-82, 17 May 2016, and Filkin v.   Portugal , no. 69729/12, 3 March 2020)?

X... comme gérant de la société Finvin et de la cession de parts à son profit par la société Foncier Investissements, que l'ensemble de ces éléments de droit et de fait sont intervenus postérieurement

This decision was upheld by the Odesa Administrative Court of Appeal on 18 March 2014.

In March 2010 the Supreme Court upheld the immigration authorities’ original decision in 2006 to expel the applicant after finding that he represented a safety risk in Slovakia on account of his involvement

Switzerland [GC], no. 51357/07, §§ 112-16, 15 March 2018)?

    On 21 March 2016 the Rotterdam Regional Court revoked the suspension of the applicant’s pre-trial detention at the public prosecutor’s request of 17 March 2016.

tard et le solde à réception de l'avion ; qu'aux termes de l'article II-2 du contrat, le délai de livraison, prévu pour un contrat "finalisé" avant la fin du mois de janvier 1997, était estimé à fin mars