However, she did not acknowledge having said what was referred to in items a. to j., but she was asked about each statement.

) against the French Republic lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a French national, Mr Laurent

  Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,   Egidijus Kūris,   Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer,   Marko Bošnjak, judges, and Andrea Tamietti, Deputy Section Registrar, Having

Zupančič,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Egidijus Kūris,   Iulia Antoanella Motoc,   Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated

Zupančič,   Alvina Gyulumyan,   Egbert Myjer,   Luis López Guerra, judges, and Stanley Naismith, Deputy Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 6 October 2009, Delivers the

The domestic courts, having before them as evidence the same IPN files, had reached different conclusions as to the nature of his involvement.

[the village of D] ... near Kragujevac, was brought before an investigating judge of the Kragujevac Court of First Instance on April 30 th of this year under suspicion of having committed the criminal

After having considered the Russian Government’s objection, the Court rejects it. THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.

It discussed Mr Fedorov’s having switched political parties and his wealth.

In this connection, they referred to the Court’s considerations in the judgment of Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France ([GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 57, ECHR 2007 ‑ IV).

committed an offence or when it is reasonably considered necessary to prevent his committing an offence or fleeing after having done so; ... 3.

    The applicant is the former leader of the “Solidarity” trade union, former President of Poland and laureate of the 1983 Nobel Peace Prize. 4.

Early, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 10 May 2011, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

Sent yesterday to the Minister of Justice by her lawyers Olivier Morice and Laurent de Caunes, the request concerns the conditions in which the judicial investigation is being carried out.

#xa0; Mārtiņš Mits,   Ganna Yudkivska,   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström,   Ivana Jelić,   Arnfinn Bårdsen,   Mattias Guyomar, judges, and Victor Soloveytchik, Section Registrar, Having

Serghides,   Jolien Schukking, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 4 September 2018, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

Serghides, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 22 November 2016, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

    Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

De Gaetano, judges, and Lawrence Early, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 18 October 2011, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.