CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3074161-3421175
1 avril 2010
Violation of Article 3 (treatment) Violation of Article 5 §§ 1 (c) and 3 Just satisfaction: EUR 10,000 (non-pecuniary damage) and EUR 3,900 (costs and expenses) Korolev v.
Page 12 sur 50
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1130JUD002432618
30 novembre 2023
54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia , no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1004JUD002580917
4 octobre 2022
Russia ([GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, §§ 71-72 and 83-84, 15 November 2018); and Korneyeva v. Russia (no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019), as indicated in the Appendix. OTHER COMPLAINTS 18.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0704JUD003900018
4 juillet 2024
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1018DEC001655916
18 octobre 2016
For a detailed description of the procedure in force before the amendments refer to Kovaleva and Others v. Russia ((dec.), no. 6025/09, 25 June 2009).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1215JUD002866517
15 décembre 2022
suspect in order to prepare an administrative offence record in the absence of any exceptional circumstances or necessity justifying the arrest and detention as required by the national legislation (see Korneyeva
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0206JUD002430517
6 février 2025
assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1110DEC001084415
10 novembre 2021
réception de la lettre des requérants Montant alloué pour dommage matériel et moral et frais et dépens par requérant (en euros) [1] 10844/15 19/02/2015 (8 requérants) TRANSINS INDUSTRY AD 2001 Antonina Koleva
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216606
9 mars 2022
question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Lyubomir Popov and the Sivova and Koleva
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0306JUD002356307
6 mars 2012
The assessment of this minimum level is, in the nature of things, relative and depends on all the circumstances of the case (see Korolev , cited above, and, mutatis mutandis , Soering v. the United Kingdom
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167662
19 septembre 2016
The facts of the applicant’s ill ‑ treatment were established in the criminal proceedings against L. and T. in the judgment of the Korolev Town Court of the Moscow Region of 22 August
ECLI:CEDH:001-224267
30 mars 2023
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0205DEC000487818
5 février 2026
27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no.
6e Section - 2e Chambre
DTA_2503269_20250711
11 juillet 2025
A..., représenté par Me Koroleva, demande au tribunal : 1°) d’annuler l’arrêté du 3 février 2025 par lequel le préfet de police a pris à son encontre une obligation de quitter le territoire français
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0105DEC007478701
5 janvier 2006
Koleva are Bulgarian nationals.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0222DEC004172620
22 février 2022
La Cour rappelle les principes développés dans sa jurisprudence concernant le critère de préjudice important ( Korolev c. Russie (déc.), n o 25551/05, CEDH 2010 et Giusti c.
ECLI:CEDH:001-247603
20 novembre 2025
602/24* 05/12/2023 OOO KULTURNYYE PROYEKTY 2022 Anastasiya Ivanovna Tyunyayeva Korolev The applicant company is the organiser of an annual Side by Side International LGBT film
ECLI:CEDH:001-205964
21 octobre 2020
Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Sivova and Koleva
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000904607
17 janvier 2012
In the case of Kosheleva and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1023DEC003168012
23 octobre 2018
36659/04, 1 June 2010; see also Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no. 25551/05, ECHR 2010).