He also alleged that the failure of the trial court to ensure his attendance at the hearings violated his right of access to court, as well as preventing him from defending himself in relation to the charge

scrutiny under Convention – political and institutional organisation of member States had accordingly to respect rights and principles enshrined in Convention – compromise between requirements of defending

All and any direct or indirect restrictions or granting of direct or indirect advantages at concluding a labour contract depending on the sex, race, skin colour, nationality, language, origin, property

Amount and procedure for payment of court fees for information and technical support of proceedings, depending on the category of case, shall be set by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. 3.

He also claims that his right to a fair trial, under Article 6 of the Convention, was breached on account of his being prevented from defending himself in person in combination with the fact that he was

Depending on their nature and seriousness, the child’s interests could override those of the parent, who was not entitled under Article   8 to take measures that would harm the child’s health and

Within the framework of the proceedings, the applicant introduced all necessary arguments defending his interests and the final decisions taken by the domestic courts bear no signs of manifest arbitrariness

Consequently, the registration of the church in the Diocese’s name had been arbitrary and barely foreseeable, and had failed to provide the applicant company with the basic procedural safeguards for defending

Depending on the quality of the domestic courts’ assessment, the Court found a breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in respect of some of the applicants ( Todorov, Gaich, Barov, Zhekovi ) and no violation

  Summary of the facts   On 14 February 2001 Mr Kyprianou was involved in a murder trial, defending an accused before the Assize Court of Limassol.

The implementation of the 2017 Act might, however, be subject to the Court’s review depending, in particular, on the authorities’ capacity to consider applications for legal aid.

equality of arms had been violated on account of the domestic court’s excessive formalism in annuling both his claim and his subsequent request for re ‑ examination, which precluded him from defending

The applicant in the Adefdromil case was an association set up in 2001 by two servicemen with the statutory aim of “examining and defending the collective or individual rights and pecuniary, occupational

The Government, while defending the conformity of the domestic courts’ decisions with the law, argued that neither the legislation in question nor the conditions of its implementation required the applicant

It is to be recalled that whenever an applicant omits, contrary to Rule   44C   §   1 of the Rules of Court, to divulge relevant information of his or her own motion, depending on the particular

The applicants (three survivors of the Holocaust in Romania and a non ‑ governmental organisation defending the rights of the victims of the Holocaust in Romania) claim that they became aware of

The applicant in the Adefdromil case was an association set up in 2001 by two servicemen with the statutory aim of “examining and defending the collective or individual rights and pecuniary, occupational

At that moment the applicant began defending himself and hit M.H. with a water bottle that he had just bought from the market. The applicant then left the scene of the incident.

The applicants submitted that to exclude farmers from the scope of Article   11 of the Convention would be to deprive a large number of persons of the possibility of collectively defending, by means