She said that she had never met T.M. but that the applicant was her friend and she had known her for some two years.

Background facts The applicant was, at the material time, a Lieutenant in the Queen Alexandra's Royal Army.

In August 2000 she was informed that her son was not being held in any prison in Russia.

    The applicant claimed that she feared that if returned to her home country she would be subjected to torture.

    The applicant claimed that in 1952, when she was 19 years' old, she had permanently settled in Famagusta (northern Cyprus), where she got married and had two sons.

    She is a widow of a military officer.

She did not agree with the proceedings [being brought] and considered that she did not need a guardian. She stressed that she regularly took [her] prescribed medication ...

She is an entrepreneur who trades in reusable glass bottles. She used a trailer parked in a yard near her house to store those bottles. 6.

She experienced a searing pain and felt as if she was about to faint. 16.     In order to avoid more ill-treatment, the applicant pretended she had fainted.

The applicant filed an objection ( Vorstellung ) against this decision in which she repeated the arguments she had submitted in her appeal.

  She complained under Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) of the length of civil proceedings she had brought for maintenance payments.

Subsequently, she explicitly consented in writing to being moved to another cell that she had to share with other convicts.

In September 1998 she was convicted as charged and sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment. She was released in December 2004 and deported to Germany.

She is currently living in ‘s-Hertogenbosch (the Netherlands).

    The wardens informed her that she was to be repatriated the next day because she did not have a valid residence permit, but that since she had not committed any crimes in Romania she was

She noticed that the recording did not correspond to the trial transcript in respect of the operative part of the judgment and, on 29 September 2009, she asked for rectification.

When she returned home, she found that the cellar door had been broken. She tried telephoning a friend to ask if she could stay the night with her, but no one answered her call.

Larisa Manole alleges that she was removed from her position as a news editor and newsreader and obliged to leave the company, despite having worked there for 22 years.

She had also told them that she had just received a call from a friend who had arrived in Moscow to “blow himself up”, and that she (that is, the applicant) “was in danger” and “under suspicion” [by the