the applicants had been denied the right of access to a tribunal, and no violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention because the applicants did not have a possession within the meaning

They submitted that they did not chase him again because the traffic light turned green and because they did not want to soil their cloths chasing P. across the river. B.

They are continuously prevented from entering the northern part of Cyprus because of their Greek-Cypriot origin.

immatriculée au registre du commerce et des sociétés de Le Mans sous le no 440 048 882, prise en la personne de son représentant légal en exercice domicilié es qualité audit siège 14 Bd Marie et Alexandre

Croatia (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 29   September 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Krzysztof Wojtyczek, President,   Linos-Alexandre

, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

The case became the subject of proceedings before a pre-trial judge who confirmed the indictment decision and sent the case to trial. The applicant appealed unsuccessfully.

This was because they had joined the proceedings at a later stage; or, because they had never been parties in the main criminal investigation since they had not expressed their intention to be included

The questioning started some time after midnight because we were waiting for a defence lawyer.

Quesada , Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 19 December 2002, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants, Mr Georgios Andreadis, Alexandros

Ms Alexandra Marinou, 13. M. Christos Tsilas, 14. M. Dimitrios Karatsovalis, 15. Ms Fani Kotakou, 16. M. Konstantinos Kotakos, 17. Ms Angeliki Mike, 18. Ms Aikaterini Tsilopoulou, 19. M.

The principal acknowledged that the mother had reported the alleged rape to her, but argued that she did not believe that the report was plausible, because there are no beds in the bathrooms and because

As for the two journalist applicants, the Regional Court refused to consider Mr Bryan as a journalist because he had had no current contract with any foreign publisher and was not accredited as a journalist

her dangerousness was not established and national law did not meet the standards of legal certainty and her detention was not “in accordance with a   procedure prescribed by law” because she was

A judgment finding him guilty in March 1999 was set aside by the court of appeal because of procedural defects during the preliminary investigation.

The applicant could not be present at the hearing because of his poor health and asked the court to examine the case in his absence.

D.C.I., the police officer in question, became angry and asked a colleague, M.C., to “take him [the applicant] to the toilets to teach him how to speak”.

In the case of Alexandru Marius Radu v.

S.V. verbalises the wish that in the divorce proceedings the custody of the children be awarded to him primarily because he wants the children to be happy.