CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

29 963 résultats pour « Bechaud »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0525JUD005179999

Admin. suprême

25 mai 2004

25 mai 2004

    The hearing scheduled for 6 January 1999 was adjourned because of the sickness of one of the co-accused. 32.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0705DEC000040605

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2011

5 juillet 2011

The court held that the 2004 Act did not apply in the applicant’s case because the proceedings in question had been terminated prior to the applicant’s length of proceedings complaint.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7272

Admin. suprême

25 octobre 2012

25 octobre 2012

Firstly, because the actual market value of the land could not objectively be determined, in particular because of the exclusive right of purchase introduced for the benefit of the State and local authorities

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-155295

Admin. suprême

21 mai 2015

21 mai 2015

The court reiterated that the prolongation was justified because the applicant had previously fled from the police and might influence witnesses, and because of the impending severe punishment and the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-159844

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2015

16 décembre 2015

Because of the first applicant’s logistics enterprise, he was not at home even most weekends and therefore took not part in the raising of the children.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0910DEC001575910

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2013

10 septembre 2013

On 20 April 1998 he sent to the company notification of his withdrawal from the contract because he had found out that the fax machine was an unsafe counterfeit.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-145862

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2014

3 juillet 2014

The applicant lodged an appeal before the Baku Court of Appeal, arguing that his conviction was in violation of his rights because the demonstration in which he had participated had been peaceful.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC001657215

Admin. suprême

30 août 2016

30 août 2016

    On 6 April 2014 the applicant party filed a complaint about the election results with the YSK and requested a re-count of the votes because of electoral discrepancies and fraud.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC001657615

Admin. suprême

30 août 2016

30 août 2016

    On 6 April 2014 the CHP filed a complaint about the election results with the YSK and asked for a re-count because of electoral discrepancies and fraud.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-147338

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2014

22 septembre 2014

In the Ombudsman’s opinion, the National CTP should not have intervened, because the case was pending before the courts and because there was no legal basis for the intervention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0930DEC002468508

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2014

30 septembre 2014

It also held that it was not established that the applicant had been ill-treated by the police and that his right to freedom of assembly had not been violated because the demonstration of 26 January 2007

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0120DEC005284307

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2015

20 janvier 2015

    The Government stated that the complaints were out of time because the expulsion had taken place in 2000 whereas the applicants had lodged their application with the Court in 2007.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-211381

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2021

28 juin 2021

Further, if T.P. had not participated in the march, it could not be excluded that he would still have died because of the unrecognised, hyperacute bacterial infection.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0512DEC002814505

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2009

12 mai 2009

They would spend the remaining time inside the cells lying down on the beds because there was not enough space for them to move around. The food served to prisoners was of very bad quality.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0406DEC002064721

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2023

6 avril 2023

    Because of the parents’ acrimonious relationship and the applicant’s inappropriate behaviour, the following interim measures were issued pending a hearing on the merits.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-180326

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2018

10 janvier 2018

The Court also found a violation on account of the undue interference with the applicant party’s possessions because the authorities refused to refund the election deposit (violation of Article 1 of Protocol

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0831DEC003642997

Admin. suprême

31 août 1999

31 août 1999

However, an adjournment was ordered at the request of the defendants' representatives because counsel were not all available to represent them on the relevant dates.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0304JUD004619818

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2025

4 mars 2025

According to minutes of the Court of First Instance dated 11 March 2014, enforcement of the judgment was not possible because the case file was not available.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208503

Admin. suprême

8 février 2021

8 février 2021

The official notes prepared by the officers of the Border Guard stated that during their questioning on 19 June 2017 the applicants submitted that they wished to enter Poland because they had not wished

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0828DEC002703804

Admin. suprême

28 août 2007

28 août 2007

because the crime had been committed outside German territory.

Source officielle

Page 119 sur 1499

← PrécédentSuivant →