CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

29 963 résultats pour « Bechaud »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-108342

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2011

2 décembre 2011

  Other general measures:   The Government considers no further general measures are necessary because the UK Government abolished the Certificate of Approval scheme on 9 May 2011 by amending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1019DEC007270101

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2004

19 octobre 2004

Several hearings were fixed and then adjourned, because the representatives of the Examinations Service failed to appear.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;STATEMENTOFFACTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2940823-3234847

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2009

7 décembre 2009

The applicant had been informed that a municipal administrator and his family had been killed because they had worked against the rebels.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0331DEC005278299

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2005

31 mars 2005

The Court further held that it did not find convincing the applicants' submissions that they did not know that the content of the leaflet was illegal and that they only distributed it because they were

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0110DEC005030316

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2023

10 janvier 2023

She argued that A.T.’s impartiality was in doubt, on the one hand, because she had dismissed allegedly unlawfully the defence’s requests for evidence and, on the other hand, because a complaint by H.G.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0918DEC004458221

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2025

18 septembre 2025

    The Government argued that the applicant no longer had status as a “victim” of the alleged violation because the links to the publications had been de-indexed, a Google search of his name

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0923DEC000934819

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2025

23 septembre 2025

    The Government considered that the application was inadmissible because the applicant had lodged his complaints with the Court outside the six-month time-limit.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1002DEC000556716

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2025

2 octobre 2025

    The applicant learnt of the administrative proceedings against him only after the case had been set down for trial before the Administrative Court, because the court had sent the relevant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422JUD007743512

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2021

22 avril 2021

    The Government submitted that the complaint was manifestly ill-founded because the courts had examined the case correctly.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0326JUD002518222

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2026

26 mars 2026

It held that the municipality was not liable because the utility company had been in charge of the management of the pool. Furthermore, Ž.N. was solely responsible for his own death.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0503DEC007685612

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2016

3 mai 2016

According to the applicant, the influence of the steering wheel’s position on the traffic safety is minimal, because it depends mainly on the driver’s skills.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-662450-668641

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 2002

3 décembre 2002

Examination of her complaint was adjourned because a second application for recovery of possession had been lodged at the same time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-164424

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2016

2 juin 2016

The District Court continued that the applicant was likely to obstruct the investigation because he had attempted to put pressure on witnesses and investigators.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0829DEC005913800

Admin. suprême

29 août 2002

29 août 2002

Because of that and for security reasons, parts of the archives of the Consular Department of the Croatian Embassy in Belgrade were moved to the Embassy’s headquarters.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619DEC002563213

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2018

19 juin 2018

    In his statement to the public prosecutor the applicant held that he had failed to return to the army barracks after his leave because of family and financial reasons.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0704DEC007591613

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2017

4 juillet 2017

According to the law’s preamble, the State budget deficit had been constantly increasing because of the economic crisis of that time and measures were needed to stabilise it (see paragraph 23 below).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0526JUD003982207

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2011

26 mai 2011

According to the doctor, because the applicant had not given his consent, it had been decided to admit him involuntarily. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0604JUD000616113

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2020

4 juin 2020

She also complained that it was evident from the case file that she had fulfilled all statutory requirements to be granted a pension, and that she had been deprived of her right to a pension only because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0929DEC005179699

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2005

29 septembre 2005

In addition, Mr K. claimed that the applicant had insisted that they shoot him, because otherwise he could identify them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002JUD000023115

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2018

2 octobre 2018

Lastly they submitted that the amount of the claim was excessive because A.K. was a student and did not have any income, and the applicant was unemployed. 18 .

Source officielle

Page 116 sur 1499

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC18 résultats

Journal officiel
Créations

SCI BECHAUD PAUL

SIREN 101185460Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Pontoise

19/02/2026

Voir →

Procédures collectives

BECHAUD, Benjamin

Greffe du Tribunal Judiciaire de Nantes

Dépôt de l'état de collocation — avis de dépôt de l’état de collocation au greffe du tribunal judiciaire de Nantes. Les contestations seront recevables auprès du greffe du juge de l’exécution de ce tribunal dans un délai de trente jours à compter de la date de la présente publication. Publication légale : Informateur judiciaire le 23 septembre 2022. N° RG : 19/03493

27/11/2022

Voir →

Créations

OCCAZOU, Guipon, Christine Madeleine, Bechaud

SIREN 312308695Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Poitiers

13/11/2022

Voir →

Procédures collectives

BECHAUD, Benjamin

Greffe du Tribunal Judiciaire de Nantes

Dépôt de l'état de collocation — Avis de dépôt de l’état des créances au Greffe du Tribunal judiciaire de Nantes. Les contestations seront recevables auprès du greffe du juge de l’exécution de ce tribunal dans un délai de trente jours à compter de la date de la présente publication. Publication légale : Informateur judiciaire le 23 septembre 2022. N° RG : 19/03493

31/10/2022

Voir →

Ventes et cessions

Bella Pizza, BECHAUD, RICHARD, Simon, Floriane

SIREN 908685001Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce d'Avignon

Acte en date du 14/12/2021 enregistré au AVIGNON1 le 20/12/2021 sous le numéro 8404P01 2021 A 04467, Adresse du nouveau propriétaire: 19 Avenue des Ramades Impasse des Marmoussets 84150 Jonquières

04/01/2022

Voir →