Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167675
23 septembre 2016
23 septembre 2016
Because of the lack of space, the applicant had no proper bed and had to sleep on the floor, on a sheet of foam material. 7.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-144979
19 mai 2014
19 mai 2014
On 7 September 2009 the applicant was remanded in detention pending trial on those charges, his detention having been found necessary because there was the risk that, if left at liberty,
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0924DEC002381804
24 septembre 2019
24 septembre 2019
By the letter of 24 July 2002 the Justice Department informed the applicant association that the judgment in its favour could not be enforced because an appeal against it was pending. 6.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-141751
12 février 2014
12 février 2014
He was released on licence on 7 September 2004 but his licence was revoked on 24 September that year because he failed to comply with the terms of the licence.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0430DEC005875016
30 avril 2019
30 avril 2019
The court also held that the fact that the applicant’s account had been frozen by a bailiff had been misleading because the applicant received money into the account of the Vilnius Correctional Facility
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-156165
15 juin 2015
15 juin 2015
This was open to abuse, because the data could have been tampered with and manipulated by the authorities.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0426DEC000041411
26 avril 2016
26 avril 2016
On 30 June 2010 the Party’s registration for the 2010 elections was refused because it was submitted out of time. The Party failed to lodge an appeal against that decision. 7.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0923DEC005860012
23 septembre 2014
23 septembre 2014
The friendly settlement proposed by the Court has failed because the Applicant did not submit a declaration thereon. 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-153746
16 mars 2015
16 mars 2015
I did not tell the doctor who did it because I was scared. When they took us to a doctor another time, I told him everything.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0404DEC007712901
4 avril 2006
4 avril 2006
On 19 June 2001, it was determined that he was not entitled because he had no dependent children. 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179376
13 novembre 2017
13 novembre 2017
It also found that given ca heavy penalty for the offence, there was a presumption of a risk of absconding, particularly because the applicant had already fled Russia.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226535
19 novembre 2009
19 novembre 2009
The applicant had been informed that a municipal administrator and his family had been killed because they had worked against the rebels.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1107DEC005382515
7 novembre 2024
7 novembre 2024
It held that Parliament had been empowered to assess the Constitutional Court’s judgment of 30 September 2010 because amending the Constitution and appointing or dismissing one-third of the judges of the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-158185
28 septembre 2015
28 septembre 2015
Because of the strong conflict between the adults, it was recommended that the bailiff’s supervision be maintained and that both parents attend courses on good parenting.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0918DEC004026503
18 septembre 2008
18 septembre 2008
She could no longer live with her husband because the room, to which he had been ordered to move, was too small.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0706DEC003856497
6 juillet 2000
6 juillet 2000
On 12 December 1996 the District Court dismissed her modified claim because the applicant had not specified its value.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0509DEC001742119
9 mai 2023
9 mai 2023
He was then taken to Botoşani Emergency Hospital (“BEH”) because he had accused the gendarmes of ill-treatment.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-109470
3 janvier 2012
3 janvier 2012
The Government submitted the summons, which noted that it had not been served because according to the [next door] neighbour the applicant was mentally ill and opened the door to no one.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1208DEC006396113
8 décembre 2022
8 décembre 2022
“until night-time”, because G. had to know the truth. On one occasion G. said: “Nobody is beating you; nobody is yelling at you. Do not cry, you are a grown boy.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219DEC005186607
19 février 2013
19 février 2013
He was allegedly not allowed to employ the services of a legal representative and he felt coerced to confess to committing the offence because he was told by the investigating prosecutor “to confess because
Source officiellePage 115 sur 1499