The court also refused the applicant's request for leave to appear at the appeal hearing because it was to be conducted without a prosecutor and because the applicant's arguments had been set out in sufficient

Those findings had been wrong because he had been not involved in any criminal acts.

That was because the prosecutor’s assertions that the applicant had since the beginning acted with fraudulent intent and agreed with other perpetrators on the means of carrying out the fraud could not

I am satisfied, as I have said, that the Parole Board was correct to accept that there is here, a breach of Article 5(4), because, and only because, in the circumstances of this case the reason why it

However, he could not move in because another person, Mrs H., was living there. The applicant applied to a court for an eviction order. 7.

On 5 May 2003 the applicant lodged a constitutional complaint against the court decision on payment of costs to M.A. claiming that it had violated his right to a fair hearing because the decision of 3

On 9 March 1984 the Disciplinary Council decided to adjourn the examination of the case, because the President of the OEK, who had been called to testify, did not appear.

  On 6 November, the prosecution made an application to postpone the hearing date because one of its witnesses was unable to attend.

On an unspecified date the applicant left Croatia allegedly because he had received death threats. He moved to Serbia. B.

A hearing listed by the Supreme Administrative Court for 3 November 1997 failed to take place because the applicants’ neighbours had not been duly summoned.

The court ordered the proceedings on the applicant's claim to be terminated because “it was not fit for examination and determination in the framework of civil proceedings”.

On the same day the applicants asked for a stay in the proceedings because they had complained about the decision of 4 December 2000 to the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.

The application was in the following terms: “I kindly ask you to grant me urgent leave because my father Wacław Płoski has died.

Even if in the future the Seym changes (...) the regulations (...), it will not be possible to receive compensation for damage suffered before the change [of legislation] because new regulations will not

    The Government submit that the applicants lost the proceedings not because of the way that the domestic courts interpreted Article 88 § 5 of Presidential Decree no. 913/1978 but because of

  That licence was revoked for a period of three months in 1978 because he failed to report to his probation officer, and again for nine months between August 1979 and April 1980 because he was alleged

account and because there existed factual discrepancies.

    On 5 February 2003 the Kherson Court of Appeal, on an appeal by S. which he had had to resubmit on several occasions because of his failure to comply with procedural requirements, quashed

At times, however, individual prisoners were rejected because they did not belong to the group which was authorised to attend the mass on a particular day.