As to the objective test of impartiality, the Government first contended that Judge S.Š. had never decided on the applicant’s guilt at first instance.

    B. admitted her guilt and declared that she had had an arrangement with the applicant to transfer S. to Turkey for the purpose of sexual exploitation.

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et un mémoire récapitulatif, enregistrés le 7 novembre 2023 et le 2 septembre 2025, la société Groupe Valliance Sécurité, représentée par Me De Guio, demande

The criminal system knows only two conclusions in a criminal case—guilt or acquittal (see Articles 365, 366, 372 and 373 of the Code of Criminal Procedure).

Lagardère’s guilt.

The applicant admitted his guilt in the offence.

According to the court, the circumstantial evidence did not unambiguously point to the applicant’s guilt and there were other possible explanations for the events.

Yaremenko’s guilt in respect of that episode, since they were obtained in violation of the requirements of criminal procedure law.

The decision regarding the question of guilt is the jury's alone, while the court proceedings are determined by the High Court's three professional judges.

    The court noted that it had to base its conviction about a defendant’s guilt on certain and clear evidence when delivering a guilty verdict.

If the judge makes a simple finding of guilt, the guilty party shall be ordered to pay costs and, as appropriate, to perform restitution. A special confiscation order shall be made.” 45.

It found that despite its instructions given in the earlier remittal orders, the degree of the applicant’s guilt was not correctly established in the proceedings before the trial court.

    The applicants submitted that the decisions of the Court of Appeal of 5 June 1998 contained a finding of guilt of criminal wrongdoing after they had been finally acquitted, in respect of

Everyone shall be presumed innocent until his or her guilt has been established in accordance with the law.

    The criminal proceedings relating to the assessment of A.T.’s guilt involved several persons and there was a need to shed light and examine material concerning complex bribery schemes.

* * * En 2002 et 2003, les demandeurs ont été mis en contact avec la société (EURL) Cabinet Guinot, devenue société VIP Patrimoine, qui diffusait une documentation commerciale relative

In particular, did the Supreme Court assess the applicants’ guilt, in whole or in part, by re-assessing the evidentiary value of testimony provided by the accused and witnesses before the District Court

janvier 1981 tendant à ce que soient refaites 33 pages photocopiées, et que soit vérifié que des actes commandés antérieurement manquent bien dans les liasses des minutes des notaires Begule, Duran et Guyot

final judgments of 3 June 2010 delivered by the Vâlcea County Court and 22 May 2014 delivered by the High Court of Cassation and Justice, the authorities reached contrasting conclusions concerning its guilt