CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

17 343 résultats pour « Delpy »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1127JUD004529105

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2014

27 novembre 2014

    The Court reiterates that an unreasonably long delay in the enforcement of a binding judgment may breach the Convention (see Burdov v.

Source officielle

Page 111 sur 868

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55523

Admin. suprême

20 février 1992

20 février 1992

  In particular, paragraph 5 of Section 109 states the decision taken may be either to declare the request inadmissible as being ill-founded or because the delays found were justified; or to request

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1019DEC000095802

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2006

19 octobre 2006

The applicants further contend, without invoking any Article of the Convention, that the rate of interest for delay payable on the additional compensation for expropriation was too low and that the expropriating

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0709DEC005572500

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2002

9 juillet 2002

The applicant argues that the delay in the enforcement of the order issued by the Cava De’ Tirreni Magistrate resulted in a denial of his right of access to a court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2729

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2007

15 mai 2007

Admissible : The application was not about personal negligence by judges but about delays in the processing of a case due to the negligent failure of the authorities to take the legislative and regulatory

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1202DEC003975298

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 1999

2 décembre 1999

    On 12 September 1996 the applicant complained about delays in the proceedings to the president of the City Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0131DEC004775899

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2002

31 janvier 2002

The applicant further complains under Article 6 of the Convention about the duration of the eviction proceedings and that the delay in the enforcement of the order issued by the Rome Magistrate resulted

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0228DEC005819100

Admin. suprême

28 février 2002

28 février 2002

THE LAW The applicant complains under Article 6 of the Convention about the duration of the eviction proceedings and that the delay in the enforcement of the order issued by the Benevento Magistrate resulted

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175010

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2017

7 juin 2017

The applicant company also complains under Article 13 of the Convention that no effective remedies were available to it against undue delays in the civil proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7492

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2013

26 mars 2013

While the authorities had initially acted without undue delay, the case was transferred to a public prosecutor after the applicant’s partner repeatedly failed to appear at court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0226DEC005111216

Admin. suprême

26 février 2019

26 février 2019

    The Court has held on numerous occasions that the right to court includes a right to have a court decision enforced without undue delay (see EVT COMPANY v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12901

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2020

7 juillet 2020

kilometres) and the need to forward the investigation file to the regional court to enable the latter to examine the applicant’s request with full knowledge of the facts, the Court considered that the delay

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1209DEC004981608

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2014

9 décembre 2014

    The Government submitted that the complaint had been inadmissible, as the application form of 2 April 2009 had been returned after a long delay.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10339

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2015

15 janvier 2015

A number of the delays were attributable to the domestic courts. The authorities had thus failed to take effective steps to execute the interim contact decision of May 2010.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-161850

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2016

7 mars 2016

They further complain about the overall delay in finalising the restitution process.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-752

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2010

23 novembre 2010

Article 46: In view of the United Kingdom’s lengthy delay in implementing the decision in Hirst and the significant number of repetitive applications that had been received by the Court shortly before

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-52203

Admin. suprême

26 février 2001

26 février 2001

satisfaction, within three months, 2 000 French francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage and that interest should be payable on any unpaid sum, calculated on the basis of each full elapsed month of delay

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-218411

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2022

10 juin 2022

detention as well as the absence of effective domestic remedies to complain about them;   Recalling its decision adopted at its 1398 th meeting urging the authorities to establish, without further delay

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922DEC004253106

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2009

22 septembre 2009

Constitutional proceedings   On 30 March 2004 the Constitutional Court found that the Žilina District Court had violated the applicant’s right to a hearing without unjustified delay.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1020DEC004813721

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2022

20 octobre 2022

failure to enforce a judgment because of the debtor’s indigence cannot be held against the State unless and to the extent that it is imputable to the domestic authorities, for example, to their errors or delay

Source officielle