CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

29 963 résultats pour « Bechaud »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0915DEC001740002

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2003

15 septembre 2003

    The applicant also complains that his right to personal security was violated because the domestic authorities have not found perpetrators so far. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0910DEC004378698

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2002

10 septembre 2002

However, he considered that they were entitled to make use of the remedies guaranteed by law and the court was not empowered to reject those petitions only because they were contributing to the delay.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0518DEC001668290

Admin. suprême

18 mai 1999

18 mai 1999

They are continuously prevented from entering the northern part of Cyprus because of their Greek-Cypriot origin.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11528

Admin. suprême

14 février 2017

14 février 2017

Secondly, the courts had taken note of the assurances received without examining them in the light of the relevant criteria, because they had not sought to ascertain whether the supervisory systems were

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-116006

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2012

20 décembre 2012

However, because of complications she had to give birth in a public hospital. She states that doctors there were critical of her attempt to give birth at home.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-172956

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2017

24 mars 2017

On 18   August 2015 Lt K. issued an order to put the applicant on the wanted persons’ list because her whereabouts were unknown.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126485

Admin. suprême

30 août 2013

30 août 2013

Specifically, the reasons provided were as follows: (a) 50 signatures were found to be invalid because they were collected on the applicant’s behalf by an active member of a municipality, in breach of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0906DEC001915908

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2011

6 septembre 2011

The removal directions to Cameroon which had been set to take place on 1 December 2007 were deferred because the applicant was considered to be medically unfit to fly.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1017DEC004284012

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2017

17 octobre 2017

The Customs Administration established that J.B. had not been allowed to drive the vehicle because he had not had habitual residence abroad.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-163370

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2016

3 mai 2016

In the past he had been the victim of discrimination because of the origin of his family name and he had suffered unacceptable disadvantages in economic and social respect.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-153614

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2015

9 mars 2015

On 15 April 2010 the FSIN replied that the second applicant had been sent to the Smolensk region pursuant to Article 73 § 2 of the Russian Code on the Execution of Sentences (“CES”) because there were

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-205934

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2020

14 octobre 2020

Because of these emails, the Board on Trial Counsel ( oikeudenkäyntiavustajalautakunta, rättegångsbiträdesnämnden , hereinafter “the Board”) took the matter ex officio for examination in order to see whether

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-114419

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2010

9 septembre 2010

that decision was upheld by a prosecutor from the Sofia city public prosecutor’s office who considered that “there was not the slightest indication” that the applicant and Mr Z.N. had been attacked because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0307DEC003117613

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2017

7 mars 2017

    On 4 October 2015 the applicants informed the Court that they had not yet concluded registered partnerships because of the discrimination against homosexual couples in respect of the place

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0703DEC001213121

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2025

3 juillet 2025

He had been personally and directly affected by the contested measures because he was a Slovak national, lived within the jurisdiction of Slovakia and had not been able to attend public religious service

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0927DEC000979105

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2016

27 septembre 2016

    On 3   August 2004 the court struck the appeal off ( возвратил ) because the applicant had not perfected it in time. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009DEC003184811

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2012

9 octobre 2012

    They alleged that the State was responsible for Muhittin Özsüren’s disappearance because he had gone missing whilst performing his military service.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2805

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2007

15 mars 2007

The Court of Appeal dismissed the first request as unfounded because the annual certificates attesting to a second-degree disability had been issued in recognition of the requested status.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-173048

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2017

23 mars 2017

However, in determining the issue of legal costs, the Regional Court had made no use of that provision and, in any event, no such circumstances pertained, in particular because the case concerned unjustified

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231659

Admin. suprême

21 février 2024

21 février 2024

On 25 December 2020, at around 8.50 p.m., the applicant called an ambulance because his 78-year-old father was feeling unwell.

Source officielle

Page 110 sur 1499

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC18 résultats

Journal officiel
Créations

SCI BECHAUD PAUL

SIREN 101185460Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Pontoise

19/02/2026

Voir →

Procédures collectives

BECHAUD, Benjamin

Greffe du Tribunal Judiciaire de Nantes

Dépôt de l'état de collocation — avis de dépôt de l’état de collocation au greffe du tribunal judiciaire de Nantes. Les contestations seront recevables auprès du greffe du juge de l’exécution de ce tribunal dans un délai de trente jours à compter de la date de la présente publication. Publication légale : Informateur judiciaire le 23 septembre 2022. N° RG : 19/03493

27/11/2022

Voir →

Créations

OCCAZOU, Guipon, Christine Madeleine, Bechaud

SIREN 312308695Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Poitiers

13/11/2022

Voir →

Procédures collectives

BECHAUD, Benjamin

Greffe du Tribunal Judiciaire de Nantes

Dépôt de l'état de collocation — Avis de dépôt de l’état des créances au Greffe du Tribunal judiciaire de Nantes. Les contestations seront recevables auprès du greffe du juge de l’exécution de ce tribunal dans un délai de trente jours à compter de la date de la présente publication. Publication légale : Informateur judiciaire le 23 septembre 2022. N° RG : 19/03493

31/10/2022

Voir →

Ventes et cessions

Bella Pizza, BECHAUD, RICHARD, Simon, Floriane

SIREN 908685001Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce d'Avignon

Acte en date du 14/12/2021 enregistré au AVIGNON1 le 20/12/2021 sous le numéro 8404P01 2021 A 04467, Adresse du nouveau propriétaire: 19 Avenue des Ramades Impasse des Marmoussets 84150 Jonquières

04/01/2022

Voir →