Luxembourg - 7446/21 Arrêt 16.2.2023 [Section V] Article 5 Article 5-3 Caractère raisonnable de la détention provisoire Raisons sommaires du rejet des demandes de mise en liberté provisoire compensées

Non-violation de l'article 5 - Droit à la liberté et à la sûrete (Article 5-3 - Caractère raisonnable de la détention provisoire)

    SUR LA VIOLATION ALLÉGUÉE DE L’ARTICLE 5 § 3 DE LA CONVENTION 23.

    SUR LA VIOLATION ALLÉGUÉE DE L’ARTICLE 5   §   3 DE LA CONVENTION 30.

Violation de l'article 5 - Droit à la liberté et à la sûrete (Article 5-3 - Durée de la détention provisoire;Juge dans un délai raisonnable)

Violation de l'article 5 - Droit à la liberté et à la sûreté (Article 5-3 - Mise en liberté conditionnelle;Durée de la détention provisoire)

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 18.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 13.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 7.

    There has accordingly been a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention. II.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 24.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 of the Convention 5.     The applicant complained principally that his pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.

They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 5 § 3 “Everyone arrested or detained in accordance with the provisions of paragraph   1

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 8.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 of the Convention 5.     The applicant complained of the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 of the Convention 6.     The applicants complained of the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 20.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 13.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 of the Convention 6.     The applicants complained of the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention.

§ 1), the alleged unlawfulness of his detention after 22   October 2013 (Article 5 § 1) and the alleged lack of justification for his pre-trial detention (Article 5 § 3) to the Azerbaijani Government