Having found that compensation for the violation could not be awarded directly on the basis of the Tort Liability Act, the Supreme Court held that there was no reason to limit the scope of application

It found that there were no grounds to consider that he had not exercised appropriate control over the lawfulness of his subordinates’ actions.

The applicant alleged that the environmental situation in the zone was hazardous for humans, and that living there was potentially dangerous to health and life.

The court stated that as the applicant had been the subject of criminal prosecution for the manner in which he had conducted his job as CEO of his company, there had been sufficient factual basis for the

The applicants maintained that the media coverage was unfair, that the five major TV channels in fact campaigned for the ruling party, that airtime was allocated unevenly and that the information disseminated

There is no indication that they asked him to specify such a country or that they took any steps to explore that option on their own initiative (compare Amie and Others , cited above, §   77).

She befriended another prisoner who was 20   years of age and requested that they share a cell.

  The applicant maintained that the effectiveness of that remedy was more than doubtful.

It was concluded that the applicant suffered from paranoid schizophrenia and that despite treatment with medication, there was no evidence of any stable improvement to his psychiatric health or that he

It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that it was

They further complain under the same Article that the authorities delayed in paying them the relevant amounts.

They admitted before the public prosecutor that they had written the petitions, either themselves or with the help of their children, but stated that they had no other motive than wanting their children

was firm evidence that they were involved in the LTTE.

They also argued that the food was of good quality and asserted that inmates received an enriched diet in full compliance with medical recommendations. 2.

They unanimously declared the complaint under Article 7 of the Convention admissible and the remainder of the application inadmissible, and held that there had been no violation of Article 7.

Lastly, the European Court of Justice considered that a directive precluded the system of equivalence in issue, and the Conseil d'Etat , taking into account the ruling of that court, found that the decree

The doctor noted that there was no danger to the applicant’s life, but that his injuries rendered him unfit for work for two days.

It seems to us that it must have been obvious to the jury that they were tasked with deciding whether the Crown had proved the intent to kill, that if they did so the sentence would be more severe and

The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (cf. Eur.