THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

    Viktoriya Maradudina   Péter Paczolay   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT Alleged violation of Article 6 § 1 of the COnvention 12.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 of the Convention 7.     The applicant complained that his appeal against the detention order of 8 February 2020 had not been decided “speedily”.

THE LAW alleged violation of articles 3 and 13 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

    Relying on Articles 3, 13 and 14 of the Convention, the applicants alleged that the investigation into their alleged ill ‑ treatment had been ineffective, that it had failed to look

;   On 11 October 2006 the Udine District Court requested an expert assessment on the nature and seriousness of the injuries suffered by the applicant, on the causal link between those and the alleged

    The applicant could not claim to have been a direct victim of the alleged violation.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 of the Convention 7.     The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention under strict imprisonment regime.

  As regards out-of-cell activities, they were limited to 15 minutes per day for use of the sanitary facilities, one hour outdoor exercise (which the prisoners alleged was not guaranteed every day

    The Government submitted that the applicant was no longer a victim of the alleged violations since the courts had provided redress for the grievance. The applicant disagreed. 10.

The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings against him due to lack of sufficient reasons provided by the domestic courts in their

He alleged that if he had not been denied access to his possessions he would have earned 13 billion each year and he would not have spent 9.60 billlion on rent (100 million per month).

alleged breach ( Blečić , cited above, § 82).

D.A. against Russia   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 16   March 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Darian Pavli, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Peeter

To require applicants to pursue a compensatory remedy before the alleged ongoing violation had ended amounted to placing an excessive procedural burden on them.

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 10.