She stressed that the 1993 assessment took account of the same types of need for assistance as the 1990 assessment, including the need for cover of car expenses.

The Town Court concluded that the applicant was in need of hospitalisation given the gravity of his disorder and his inability to take care of his own basic needs.

to be transferred to an Athens hospital; he also needed to be accompanied by someone as he was bedridden ( κατάκλιση ).

Sine April 2009 the applicant needs special assistance and treatment on account of fractures of both heel bones and injury to lumbar vertebras. A.

Therefore, he needed two more operations, in January and March 2003.

The children were in need of long-term care outside their home.

In May 1998 A. had been examined by psychologist J.S., who had concluded that he was in need of a living environment with clear and safe limits and needed to learn and find ways to solve conflict situations

. # Appeal - Officials - Resettlement Allowance - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate. # Case C-217/01 P.

#Rechtsmittel - Staatliche Beihilfen - Güterkraftverkehr - Auswirkung auf den Handel zwischen Mitgliedstaaten und Wettbewerbsverzerrung - Bestehende oder neue Beihilfen - Grundsätze der Verhältnismäßigkeit

#Official - Medical Committee - Fixing of the partial permanent invalidity rate - No need to give a decision.#Case T-140/89.

. # Community trade mark - Opposition - Opposition withdrawn - No need to adjudicate. # Case T-10/01.

The Dutch doctor stated, in particular, that in such situations surgery was almost always needed for long-term results, as it would maximise a joint’s stability and minimise the risk of arthritis.

The child-protection services had held that she was in need of guidance on how to care for X.

to and from work and the need for help with heavy domestic duties.

He was also in need of constant care and supervision, which was difficult to combine with “other work activities” that would “allow for flexible working hours”.

What she had intended to say was that she needed to go to the toilet. The applicant also alleged that the parcels had been on top of her clothes in her suitcase.

Given that the child was in need of care and attention, it had to be concluded that the child needed protection. There was an approved foster family which could take care of the child.

    Although it was established that N. had acted in excess of the measures needed for an arrest, criminal proceedings against him were eventually terminated as time barred.

The District Court also noted that the parents had clearly stated that they needed help dealing with the third applicant.