It therefore remitted the case to the Manisa Administrative Court for a fresh examination. 10.

In particular, did the domestic authorities reasonably establish that the assets at issue were the proceeds of crime (see Todorov and Others v.

  Maria MICHAILIDI-GENOUZI 1958 Acharnes Greek 53.   Zoi MICHAILIDOU-BOULIOPOULOU 1964 Athens Greek 54.   Maria MOUCHIKA 1960 Labrini Greek 55.

affaires contre Portugal   Requête n o Affaire Date de la décision 52761/13 ÁLVARO BENTO VIEIRA ET ANA MARIA VIEIRA BATISTA 17/11/2015 59513/13 MANUEL MARTINS CASCALHEIRA 17/11/2015 42868/13 COOPURB

toque : P0577 INTIMÉ OFFICE NATIONAL D'INDEMNISATION DES ACCIDENTS MÉDI CAUX, DES AFFECTIONS IATROGÈNES ET DES INFECTIONS SUITE DENOMINATION NOSOCOMIALES [Adresse 3] Représentée par Me Luca DE MARIA

take place, did not apply adequate measures of restraint.

North Macedonia 07/09/2016 Marija TODOROVSKA 27/09/1935 Skopje 11 76320/16 Nenov v. North Macedonia 02/12/2016 Marjan NENOV 11/07/1976 Skopje 12 76354/16 Naumov v.

Madame Diane B... qui a été assignée par acte du 23 mars 2005 n ¿ a pas constitué avocat.

Italy Antonella LOVISOTTO 1960 Mareno di Piave 4. 4912/21 Mario v. Italy Donatella MARIO 1963 Conegliano 5. 5033/21 Cia v. Italy Augusta CIA 1941 Oderzo 6. 5034/21 Pasquot v.

    The applicant, Ms Dina Maria Calçado Cordeiro, is a Portuguese national, who was born in 1959 and lives in Santarém. The circumstances of the case 2.

In view of the authorities the name “The zone of law” did not describe the activity of the organisation.

    The Government requested the revision of the judgment of 4   March 2025, which they had been unable to execute in full because two of the applicants, Ms Maria Cantemir and Mr Vasile

DIE, Conseiller Mme WEBER, Vice-président placé faisant fonction de Conseiller qui en ont délibéré.

; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 11 December 2023   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 49873/22 Marina

If so, did the interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant?   3.

So did having to appeal to the authorities, a procedure that had been all the more difficult because she was disabled.

    Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of their civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

[F] [V] Représenté par Me Clément DIAZ, avocat au barreau de NICE Mme [U] [S] épouse [V] Représentée par Me Clément DIAZ, avocat au barreau de NICE Appelants S.C.I.

She also complains under Article 13 of the Convention that she did not have at her disposal an effective domestic remedy. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.