In May 1999, the Regional Court dismissed the action, finding it established that the applicant had been listed as a “candidate for secret collaboration” and as an “agent” of the StB.

March 2005. 11 .

  69190/01, 30 March 2004; Lyons and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no.   15227/03, ECHR 2003-IX; and Marckx v.

’s final sentencing to life imprisonment (see the appended table) to 3 March 2023.

On 10 March 2006 the Commercial Court of the Odesa Region allowed the claim.

The applicant was informed of this in a letter dated 14 March 2001. The letter was sent by registered post on 16   March 2001, but it is unclear when it was received.

That finding had vitiated any action resulting from the imposition of the charges.

  241/2005 and of Article   10 1 of the Criminal Code in force in March   2011 concerning sentencing. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

On 3 March 1993, they served notice on the tenant informing her that the order for possession would be enforced by a bailiff on 30 March 1993.

It based its findings on the expert witness testimony given in the criminal proceedings. 2.

sur stocks de produits finis et semi-finis et de matière première, en retenant ces postes de préjudice sans s'expliquer sur la réalité de ces pertes de marge, la cour d'appel a privé sa décision de base

  The Court held, unanimously, that the finding of a violation constituted in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicants.

36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 26 March

On 9 March 2007 the applicant was arrested on suspicion of drug trafficking. In the course of the arrest the applicant was allegedly beaten up by the police.

margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. 95 March

During the criminal proceedings against him, at the hearings on 26   April 2017 and 23 March 2019, the applicant raised his allegations of ill-treatment before the Ankara Assize Court.

In March 2019 the board of the residents’ association drew up a list of premises that were used by all residents, which list included all the hallways in the building.

On 12 March 2015 the applicant filed a counter-claim whereby he contested the actions of the police interfering, inter alia , with his rights to liberty and to freedom of assembly.

    On 24 March 1997 the Town Court found in favour of the applicant.